netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: fix build by renaming variables

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 16 Dec 2019 15:29:38 +0100
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc:     Prashant Bhole <prashantbhole.linux@...il.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: fix build by renaming variables

On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 06:02:26AM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 5:25 AM Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net> wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 05:27:38PM +0900, Prashant Bhole wrote:
> > > In btf__align_of() variable name 't' is shadowed by inner block
> > > declaration of another variable with same name. Patch renames
> > > variables in order to fix it.
> > >
> > >   CC       sharedobjs/btf.o
> > > btf.c: In function ‘btf__align_of’:
> > > btf.c:303:21: error: declaration of ‘t’ shadows a previous local [-Werror=shadow]
> > >   303 |   int i, align = 1, t;
> > >       |                     ^
> > > btf.c:283:25: note: shadowed declaration is here
> > >   283 |  const struct btf_type *t = btf__type_by_id(btf, id);
> > >       |
> > >
> > > Fixes: 3d208f4ca111 ("libbpf: Expose btf__align_of() API")
> > > Signed-off-by: Prashant Bhole <prashantbhole.linux@...il.com>
> >
> > Applied, thanks!
> 
> Prashant,
> Thanks for the fixes.
> Which compiler do use?
> Sadly I didn't see any of those with my gcc 6.3.0
> Going to upgrade it. Need to decide which one.

I've seen it with:

$ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 9.0.1 20190312 (Red Hat 9.0.1-0.10)