lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <VI1PR0402MB2800732700E97A1ECB98202EE0510@VI1PR0402MB2800.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Mon, 16 Dec 2019 14:55:52 +0000
From:   Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
CC:     "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Y.b. Lu" <yangbo.lu@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net] dpaa2-ptp: fix double free of the ptp_qoriq IRQ

> Subject: Re: [PATCH net] dpaa2-ptp: fix double free of the ptp_qoriq IRQ
> 
> On Fri, 13 Dec 2019 12:04:22 +0200, Ioana Ciornei wrote:
> > Upon reusing the ptp_qoriq driver, the ptp_qoriq_free() function was
> > used on the remove path to free any allocated resources.
> > The ptp_qoriq IRQ is among these resources that are freed in
> > ptp_qoriq_free() even though it is also a managed one (allocated using
> > devm_request_threaded_irq).
> >
> > Drop the resource managed version of requesting the IRQ in order to
> > not trigger a double free of the interrupt as below:
> >
> > [  226.731005] Trying to free already-free IRQ 126 [  226.735533]
> > WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 749 at kernel/irq/manage.c:1707
> > __free_irq+0x9c/0x2b8
> > [  226.743435] Modules linked in:
> > [  226.746480] CPU: 6 PID: 749 Comm: bash Tainted: G        W
> > 5.4.0-03629-gfd7102c32b2c-dirty #912
> > [  226.755857] Hardware name: NXP Layerscape LX2160ARDB (DT) [
> > 226.761244] pstate: 40000085 (nZcv daIf -PAN -UAO) [  226.766022] pc :
> > __free_irq+0x9c/0x2b8 [  226.769758] lr : __free_irq+0x9c/0x2b8 [
> > 226.773493] sp : ffff8000125039f0
> > (...)
> > [  226.856275] Call trace:
> > [  226.858710]  __free_irq+0x9c/0x2b8
> > [  226.862098]  free_irq+0x30/0x70
> > [  226.865229]  devm_irq_release+0x14/0x20 [  226.869054]
> > release_nodes+0x1b0/0x220 [  226.872790]  devres_release_all+0x34/0x50
> > [  226.876790]  device_release_driver_internal+0x100/0x1c0
> >
> > Fixes: d346c9e86d86 ("dpaa2-ptp: reuse ptp_qoriq driver")
> > Cc: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@....com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa2/dpaa2-ptp.c | 12 +++++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa2/dpaa2-ptp.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa2/dpaa2-ptp.c
> > index a9503aea527f..04a4b316f1dc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa2/dpaa2-ptp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa2/dpaa2-ptp.c
> > @@ -160,10 +160,10 @@ static int dpaa2_ptp_probe(struct fsl_mc_device
> *mc_dev)
> >  	irq = mc_dev->irqs[0];
> >  	ptp_qoriq->irq = irq->msi_desc->irq;
> >
> > -	err = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, ptp_qoriq->irq, NULL,
> > -					dpaa2_ptp_irq_handler_thread,
> > -					IRQF_NO_SUSPEND | IRQF_ONESHOT,
> > -					dev_name(dev), ptp_qoriq);
> > +	err = request_threaded_irq(ptp_qoriq->irq, NULL,
> > +				   dpaa2_ptp_irq_handler_thread,
> > +				   IRQF_NO_SUSPEND | IRQF_ONESHOT,
> > +				   dev_name(dev), ptp_qoriq);
> >  	if (err < 0) {
> >  		dev_err(dev, "devm_request_threaded_irq(): %d\n", err);
> >  		goto err_free_mc_irq;
> > @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ static int dpaa2_ptp_probe(struct fsl_mc_device
> *mc_dev)
> >  				   DPRTC_IRQ_INDEX, 1);
> >  	if (err < 0) {
> >  		dev_err(dev, "dprtc_set_irq_enable(): %d\n", err);
> > -		goto err_free_mc_irq;
> > +		goto err_free_threaded_irq;
> >  	}
> >
> >  	err = ptp_qoriq_init(ptp_qoriq, base, &dpaa2_ptp_caps);
> 
> There is another goto right here which still jumps to err_free_mc_irq rather than
> err_free_threaded_irq. Is that intentional?

No, that is an oversight from my part. Will fix in v2.

Thanks,
Ioana


> 
> > @@ -185,6 +185,8 @@ static int dpaa2_ptp_probe(struct fsl_mc_device
> > *mc_dev)
> >
> >  	return 0;
> >
> > +err_free_threaded_irq:
> > +	free_irq(ptp_qoriq->irq, ptp_qoriq);
> >  err_free_mc_irq:
> >  	fsl_mc_free_irqs(mc_dev);
> >  err_unmap:

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ