lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5f85701b-278e-e7f9-dc43-d7572cc788d4@mellanox.com>
Date:   Mon, 16 Dec 2019 09:01:53 +0000
From:   Parav Pandit <parav@...lanox.com>
To:     Shannon Nelson <snelson@...sando.io>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 2/2] ionic: support sr-iov operations

On 12/14/2019 12:25 AM, Shannon Nelson wrote:
> Add the netdev ops for managing VFs.  Since most of the
> management work happens in the NIC firmware, the driver becomes
> mostly a pass-through for the network stack commands that want
> to control and configure the VFs.
> 
> We also tweak ionic_station_set() a little to allow for
> the VFs that start off with a zero'd mac address.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <snelson@...sando.io>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic.h   |  17 +-
>  .../ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_bus_pci.c   | 101 ++++++++
>  .../net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_dev.c   |  58 +++++
>  .../net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_dev.h   |   7 +
>  .../net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_lif.c   | 222 +++++++++++++++++-
>  .../net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_main.c  |   4 +
>  6 files changed, 401 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic.h
> index 98e102af7756..74b358f03599 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic.h
> @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ struct ionic_lif;
>  
>  #define IONIC_DRV_NAME		"ionic"
>  #define IONIC_DRV_DESCRIPTION	"Pensando Ethernet NIC Driver"
> -#define IONIC_DRV_VERSION	"0.18.0-k"
> +#define IONIC_DRV_VERSION	"0.20.0-k"
>  
>  #define PCI_VENDOR_ID_PENSANDO			0x1dd8
>  
> @@ -25,12 +25,25 @@ struct ionic_lif;
>  
>  #define DEVCMD_TIMEOUT  10
>  
> +struct ionic_vf {
> +	u16	 index;
> +	u8	 macaddr[6];
> +	__le32	 maxrate;
> +	__le16	 vlanid;
> +	u8	 spoofchk;
> +	u8	 trusted;
> +	u8	 linkstate;
> +	dma_addr_t       stats_pa;
> +	struct ionic_lif_stats stats;
> +};
> +
>  struct ionic {
>  	struct pci_dev *pdev;
>  	struct device *dev;
>  	struct devlink_port dl_port;
>  	struct ionic_dev idev;
>  	struct mutex dev_cmd_lock;	/* lock for dev_cmd operations */
> +	struct rw_semaphore vf_op_lock;	/* lock for VF operations */
It is better to place this semaphore adjucent to other related VF fields
you have below as they are all used together.
>  	struct dentry *dentry;
>  	struct ionic_dev_bar bars[IONIC_BARS_MAX];
>  	unsigned int num_bars;
> @@ -46,6 +59,8 @@ struct ionic {
>  	DECLARE_BITMAP(intrs, IONIC_INTR_CTRL_REGS_MAX);
>  	struct work_struct nb_work;
>  	struct notifier_block nb;
> +	unsigned int num_vfs;
If you intent to store this, store is as 'int' because that is what is
coming from sriov_configure() at the moment.
But it sholdn't be stored. More below.

> +	struct ionic_vf **vf;
>  	struct timer_list watchdog_timer;
>  	int watchdog_period;
>  };
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_bus_pci.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_bus_pci.c
> index 9a9ab8cb2cb3..b9a3e1e1d41e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_bus_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_bus_pci.c
> @@ -104,10 +104,101 @@ void ionic_bus_unmap_dbpage(struct ionic *ionic, void __iomem *page)
>  	iounmap(page);
>  }
>  
> +static void ionic_vf_dealloc(struct ionic *ionic)
> +{
> +	struct ionic_vf *v;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for (i = ionic->num_vfs - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
Here you are checking for >= 0, so it must be 'int'.

> +		v = ionic->vf[i];
> +		dma_unmap_single(ionic->dev, v->stats_pa,
> +				 sizeof(v->stats), DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> +		kfree(v);
> +		ionic->vf[i] = NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	ionic->num_vfs = 0;
> +	kfree(ionic->vf);
> +	ionic->vf = NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static int ionic_vf_alloc(struct ionic *ionic, int num_vfs)
> +{
> +	struct ionic_vf *v;
> +	int err, i;
> +
int err;
int i;

> +	ionic->vf = kcalloc(num_vfs, sizeof(struct ionic_vf *), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!ionic->vf)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < num_vfs; i++) {
> +		v = kzalloc(sizeof(*v), GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!v) {
> +			err = -ENOMEM;
> +			goto err_out;
> +		}
> +
> +		v->stats_pa = dma_map_single(ionic->dev, &v->stats,
> +					     sizeof(v->stats), DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> +		if (dma_mapping_error(ionic->dev, v->stats_pa)) {
> +			err = -ENODEV;
> +			kfree(v);
> +			ionic->vf[i] = NULL;
> +			goto err_out;
> +		}
> +
> +		ionic->vf[i] = v;
> +		ionic->num_vfs++;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +err_out:
> +	ionic_vf_dealloc(ionic);
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
> +static int ionic_sriov_configure(struct pci_dev *pdev, int num_vfs)
> +{
> +	struct ionic *ionic = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +	struct device *dev = ionic->dev;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	down_write(&ionic->vf_op_lock);
> +
> +	if (num_vfs > 0) {
> +		ret = pci_enable_sriov(pdev, num_vfs);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "Cannot enable SRIOV: %d\n", ret);
> +			goto out;
> +		}
> +
> +		ret = ionic_vf_alloc(ionic, num_vfs);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "Cannot alloc VFs: %d\n", ret);
> +			pci_disable_sriov(pdev);
> +			goto out;
> +		}
> +
> +		ret = num_vfs;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (num_vfs == 0) {
It should be the else of num_vfs > 0.

> +		pci_disable_sriov(pdev);
> +		ionic_vf_dealloc(ionic);
> +	}
> +
> +out:
> +	up_write(&ionic->vf_op_lock);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  static int ionic_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>  	struct ionic *ionic;
> +	int num_vfs;
>  	int err;
>  
>  	ionic = ionic_devlink_alloc(dev);
> @@ -118,6 +209,7 @@ static int ionic_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
>  	ionic->dev = dev;
>  	pci_set_drvdata(pdev, ionic);
>  	mutex_init(&ionic->dev_cmd_lock);
> +	init_rwsem(&ionic->vf_op_lock);
>  
Better to initialize below before reading num_vfs, so all VF config code
is adjcent to each other.

>  	/* Query system for DMA addressing limitation for the device. */
>  	err = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(IONIC_ADDR_LEN));
> @@ -206,6 +298,14 @@ static int ionic_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
>  		goto err_out_free_lifs;
>  	}
>  
> +	num_vfs = pci_num_vf(pdev);
> +	if (num_vfs) {
> +		dev_info(dev, "%d VFs found already enabled\n", num_vfs);
> +		err = ionic_vf_alloc(ionic, num_vfs);
> +		if (err)
> +			dev_err(dev, "Cannot enable existing VFs: %d\n", err);
> +	}
> +
>  	err = ionic_lifs_register(ionic);
>  	if (err) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "Cannot register LIFs: %d, aborting\n", err);
There should be error unwinding to perform vf_dealloc() where
lifs_register or other functions fail in the probe sequence. Otherwise
its memory leak bug.

> @@ -279,6 +379,7 @@ static struct pci_driver ionic_driver = {
>  	.id_table = ionic_id_table,
>  	.probe = ionic_probe,
>  	.remove = ionic_remove,
> +	.sriov_configure = ionic_sriov_configure,
>  };
>  
>  int ionic_bus_register_driver(void)
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_dev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_dev.c
> index 5f9d2ec70446..87f82f36812f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_dev.c
> @@ -286,6 +286,64 @@ void ionic_dev_cmd_port_pause(struct ionic_dev *idev, u8 pause_type)
>  	ionic_dev_cmd_go(idev, &cmd);
>  }
>  
> +/* VF commands */
> +int ionic_set_vf_config(struct ionic *ionic, int vf, u8 attr, u8 *data)
> +{
> +	union ionic_dev_cmd cmd = {
> +		.vf_setattr.opcode = IONIC_CMD_VF_SETATTR,
> +		.vf_setattr.attr = attr,
> +		.vf_setattr.vf_index = vf,
> +	};
> +	int err;
> +
> +	switch (attr) {
> +	case IONIC_VF_ATTR_SPOOFCHK:
> +		cmd.vf_setattr.spoofchk = *data;
> +		dev_dbg(ionic->dev, "%s: vf %d spoof %d\n",
> +			__func__, vf, *data);
> +		break;
> +	case IONIC_VF_ATTR_TRUST:
> +		cmd.vf_setattr.trust = *data;
> +		dev_dbg(ionic->dev, "%s: vf %d trust %d\n",
> +			__func__, vf, *data);
> +		break;
> +	case IONIC_VF_ATTR_LINKSTATE:
> +		cmd.vf_setattr.linkstate = *data;
> +		dev_dbg(ionic->dev, "%s: vf %d linkstate %d\n",
> +			__func__, vf, *data);
> +		break;
> +	case IONIC_VF_ATTR_MAC:
> +		ether_addr_copy(cmd.vf_setattr.macaddr, data);
> +		dev_dbg(ionic->dev, "%s: vf %d macaddr %pM\n",
> +			__func__, vf, data);
> +		break;
> +	case IONIC_VF_ATTR_VLAN:
> +		cmd.vf_setattr.vlanid = cpu_to_le16(*(u16 *)data);
> +		dev_dbg(ionic->dev, "%s: vf %d vlan %d\n",
> +			__func__, vf, *(u16 *)data);
> +		break;
> +	case IONIC_VF_ATTR_RATE:
> +		cmd.vf_setattr.maxrate = cpu_to_le32(*(u32 *)data);
> +		dev_dbg(ionic->dev, "%s: vf %d maxrate %d\n",
> +			__func__, vf, *(u32 *)data);
> +		break;
> +	case IONIC_VF_ATTR_STATSADDR:
> +		cmd.vf_setattr.stats_pa = cpu_to_le64(*(u64 *)data);
> +		dev_dbg(ionic->dev, "%s: vf %d stats_pa 0x%08llx\n",
> +			__func__, vf, *(u64 *)data);
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&ionic->dev_cmd_lock);
> +	ionic_dev_cmd_go(&ionic->idev, &cmd);
> +	err = ionic_dev_cmd_wait(ionic, DEVCMD_TIMEOUT);
> +	mutex_unlock(&ionic->dev_cmd_lock);
> +
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
>  /* LIF commands */
>  void ionic_dev_cmd_lif_identify(struct ionic_dev *idev, u8 type, u8 ver)
>  {
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_dev.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_dev.h
> index 4665c5dc5324..7838e342c4fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_dev.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_dev.h
> @@ -113,6 +113,12 @@ static_assert(sizeof(struct ionic_rxq_desc) == 16);
>  static_assert(sizeof(struct ionic_rxq_sg_desc) == 128);
>  static_assert(sizeof(struct ionic_rxq_comp) == 16);
>  
> +/* SR/IOV */
> +static_assert(sizeof(struct ionic_vf_setattr_cmd) == 64);
> +static_assert(sizeof(struct ionic_vf_setattr_comp) == 16);
> +static_assert(sizeof(struct ionic_vf_getattr_cmd) == 64);
> +static_assert(sizeof(struct ionic_vf_getattr_comp) == 16);
> +
>  struct ionic_devinfo {
>  	u8 asic_type;
>  	u8 asic_rev;
> @@ -275,6 +281,7 @@ void ionic_dev_cmd_port_autoneg(struct ionic_dev *idev, u8 an_enable);
>  void ionic_dev_cmd_port_fec(struct ionic_dev *idev, u8 fec_type);
>  void ionic_dev_cmd_port_pause(struct ionic_dev *idev, u8 pause_type);
>  
> +int ionic_set_vf_config(struct ionic *ionic, int vf, u8 attr, u8 *data);
>  void ionic_dev_cmd_lif_identify(struct ionic_dev *idev, u8 type, u8 ver);
>  void ionic_dev_cmd_lif_init(struct ionic_dev *idev, u16 lif_index,
>  			    dma_addr_t addr);
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_lif.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_lif.c
> index 60fd14df49d7..6cd6ac1fff81 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_lif.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_lif.c
> @@ -1616,6 +1616,202 @@ int ionic_stop(struct net_device *netdev)
>  	return err;
>  }
>  
> +static int ionic_get_vf_config(struct net_device *netdev,
> +			       int vf, struct ifla_vf_info *ivf)
> +{
> +	struct ionic_lif *lif = netdev_priv(netdev);
> +	struct ionic *ionic = lif->ionic;
> +
> +	if (vf >= ionic->num_vfs)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
Move this check as below after vf_op_lock as

if (vf >= pci_num_vfs(pci_dev)
	return -EINVAL;

Similarly for other friends function below.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ