[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191216103819.359535-1-toke@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 11:38:19 +0100
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] samples/bpf: Set -fno-stack-protector when building BPF programs
It seems Clang can in some cases turn on stack protection by default, which
doesn't work with BPF. This was reported once before[0], but it seems the
flag to explicitly turn off the stack protector wasn't added to the
Makefile, so do that now.
The symptom of this is compile errors like the following:
error: <unknown>:0:0: in function bpf_prog1 i32 (%struct.__sk_buff*): A call to built-in function '__stack_chk_fail' is not supported.
[0] https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg556400.html
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
---
samples/bpf/Makefile | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
index b00651608765..f51804ef12c3 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
+++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
@@ -234,6 +234,7 @@ BTF_LLVM_PROBE := $(shell echo "int main() { return 0; }" | \
readelf -S ./llvm_btf_verify.o | grep BTF; \
/bin/rm -f ./llvm_btf_verify.o)
+BPF_EXTRA_CFLAGS += -fno-stack-protector
ifneq ($(BTF_LLVM_PROBE),)
BPF_EXTRA_CFLAGS += -g
else
--
2.24.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists