[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <157661793667.26178.2900020767109305347@aguedesl-mac01.jf.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 13:25:36 -0800
From: Andre Guedes <andre.guedes@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>,
Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2-next] taprio: Add support for the SetAndHold and SetAndRelease commands
Hi Jose,
Quoting Jose Abreu (2019-12-17 06:10:24)
> Although this is already in kernel, currently the tool does not support
> them. We need these commands for full TSN features which are currently
> supported in Synopsys IPs such as QoS and XGMAC3.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
> ---
> Cc: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>
> Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
> ---
> tc/q_taprio.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tc/q_taprio.c b/tc/q_taprio.c
> index b9954436b0f9..62ff860e80ae 100644
> --- a/tc/q_taprio.c
> +++ b/tc/q_taprio.c
> @@ -99,6 +99,10 @@ static const char *entry_cmd_to_str(__u8 cmd)
> switch (cmd) {
> case TC_TAPRIO_CMD_SET_GATES:
> return "S";
> + case TC_TAPRIO_CMD_SET_AND_HOLD:
> + return "H";
> + case TC_TAPRIO_CMD_SET_AND_RELEASE:
> + return "R";
> default:
> return "Invalid";
> }
> @@ -108,6 +112,10 @@ static int str_to_entry_cmd(const char *str)
> {
> if (strcmp(str, "S") == 0)
> return TC_TAPRIO_CMD_SET_GATES;
> + if (strcmp(str, "H") == 0)
> + return TC_TAPRIO_CMD_SET_AND_HOLD;
> + if (strcmp(str, "R") == 0)
> + return TC_TAPRIO_CMD_SET_AND_RELEASE;
>
> return -1;
> }
>From the commit message, I had the impression that HOLD and RELEASE commands
are supported by QoS and XGMAC3. However, in '[PATCH net-next v2 7/7] net:
stmmac: Integrate EST with TAPRIO scheduler API' I see:
+ if (qopt->entries[i].command != TC_TAPRIO_CMD_SET_GATES)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
Am I missing something or these commands are indeed not supported by Synopsys
IPs?
Anyhow, this patch makes sense to me.
Regards,
Andre
Powered by blists - more mailing lists