netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 3/8] net: bcmgenet: use CHECKSUM_COMPLETE for NETIF_F

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20191217.152126.1428798833164203299.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Tue, 17 Dec 2019 15:21:26 -0800 (PST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     f.fainelli@...il.com
Cc:     opendmb@...il.com, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/8] net: bcmgenet: use CHECKSUM_COMPLETE for
 NETIF_F_RXCSUM

From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 14:52:07 -0800

> On 12/17/19 1:16 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Doug Berger <opendmb@...il.com>
>> Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 13:02:24 -0800
>> 
>>> This commit updates the Rx checksum offload behavior of the driver
>>> to use the more generic CHECKSUM_COMPLETE method that supports all
>>> protocols over the CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY method that only applies
>>> to some protocols known by the hardware.
>>>
>>> This behavior is perceived to be superior.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@...il.com>
>> 
>> This has to be done in the same patch that you change to use
>> the NETIF_F_HW_CSUM feature flag.
> 
> Even if we were already advertising support for NETIF_F_RXCSUM before
> patch #2? Not questioning your comment, just trying to understand why
> this is deemed necessary here since it does not affect the same "direction".

My bad... I misunderstood the situation.

Ignore me :-)