[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ+HfNi+hAKY+yyW=p+xzbc=0AGu4DcmyTBGmnJFBjQnC7Nb4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 13:18:10 +0100
From: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Cc: Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
"Karlsson, Magnus" <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
Maciej Fijalkowski <maciejromanfijalkowski@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/8] Simplify xdp_do_redirect_map()/xdp_do_flush_map()
and XDP maps
On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 at 13:04, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 12:39:53 +0100
> Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 at 12:11, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 11:53:52 +0100
> > > Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > $ sudo ./xdp_redirect_cpu --dev enp134s0f0 --cpu 22 xdp_cpu_map0
> > > >
> > > > Running XDP/eBPF prog_name:xdp_cpu_map5_lb_hash_ip_pairs
> > > > XDP-cpumap CPU:to pps drop-pps extra-info
> > > > XDP-RX 20 7723038 0 0
> > > > XDP-RX total 7723038 0
> > > > cpumap_kthread total 0 0 0
> > > > redirect_err total 0 0
> > > > xdp_exception total 0 0
> > >
> > > Hmm... I'm missing some counters on the kthread side.
> > >
> >
> > Oh? Any ideas why? I just ran the upstream sample straight off.
>
> Looks like it happened in commit: bbaf6029c49c ("samples/bpf: Convert
> XDP samples to libbpf usage") (Cc Maciej).
>
> The old bpf_load.c will auto attach the tracepoints... for and libbpf
> you have to be explicit about it.
>
> Can I ask you to also run a test with --stress-mode for
> ./xdp_redirect_cpu, to flush out any potential RCU race-conditions
> (don't provide output, this is just a robustness test).
>
Sure! Other than that, does the command line above make sense? I'm
blasting UDP packets to core 20, and the idea was to re-route them to
22.
Björn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists