netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 6/9] riscv, bpf: provide RISC-V specific JIT image alloc/free

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 18 Dec 2019 07:23:07 +0100
From:   Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com>
To:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 6/9] riscv, bpf: provide RISC-V specific JIT
 image alloc/free

On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 at 16:09, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net> wrote:
>
> On 12/16/19 10:13 AM, Björn Töpel wrote:
> > This commit makes sure that the JIT images is kept close to the kernel
> > text, so BPF calls can use relative calling with auipc/jalr or jal
> > instead of loading the full 64-bit address and jalr.
> >
> > The BPF JIT image region is 128 MB before the kernel text.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com>
> > ---
> >   arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h |  4 ++++
> >   arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp.c    | 13 +++++++++++++
> >   2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
> > index 7ff0ed4f292e..cc3f49415620 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
> > @@ -404,6 +404,10 @@ static inline int ptep_clear_flush_young(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> >   #define VMALLOC_END      (PAGE_OFFSET - 1)
> >   #define VMALLOC_START    (PAGE_OFFSET - VMALLOC_SIZE)
> >
> > +#define BPF_JIT_REGION_SIZE  (SZ_128M)
> > +#define BPF_JIT_REGION_START (PAGE_OFFSET - BPF_JIT_REGION_SIZE)
> > +#define BPF_JIT_REGION_END   (VMALLOC_END)
> > +
>
> Series looks good to me, thanks; I'd like to get an ACK from Palmer/others on this one.
>

Palmer/Paul/Albert, any thoughts/input? I can respin the the series
w/o the call optimizations (excluding this patch and the next), but
I'd prefer not given it's a nice speed/clean up for calls.