[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191219173016.GD25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 17:30:16 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: madalin.bucur@....com
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, andrew@...n.ch,
f.fainelli@...il.com, hkallweit1@...il.com, shawnguo@...nel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@....nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] net: fsl/fman: add support for PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SFI
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 05:21:20PM +0200, Madalin Bucur wrote:
> Add support for the SFI PHY interface mode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@....nxp.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_memac.c | 2 ++
> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/mac.c | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_memac.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_memac.c
> index d0b12efadd6c..09fdec935bf2 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_memac.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_memac.c
> @@ -440,6 +440,7 @@ static int init(struct memac_regs __iomem *regs, struct memac_cfg *cfg,
> tmp = 0;
> switch (phy_if) {
> case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_XFI:
> + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SFI:
No difference between these two.
> case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_XGMII:
> tmp |= IF_MODE_10G;
> break;
> @@ -456,6 +457,7 @@ static int init(struct memac_regs __iomem *regs, struct memac_cfg *cfg,
> /* TX_FIFO_SECTIONS */
> tmp = 0;
> if (phy_if == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_XFI ||
> + phy_if == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SFI ||
Again, no difference between these two.
> phy_if == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_XGMII) {
> if (slow_10g_if) {
> tmp |= (TX_FIFO_SECTIONS_TX_AVAIL_SLOW_10G |
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/mac.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/mac.c
> index 2944188c19b3..5e6317742c38 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/mac.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/mac.c
> @@ -542,6 +542,7 @@ static const u16 phy2speed[] = {
> [PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_QSGMII] = SPEED_1000,
> [PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_XGMII] = SPEED_10000,
> [PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_XFI] = SPEED_10000,
> + [PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SFI] = SPEED_10000,
Again, no difference between these two.
> };
>
> static struct platform_device *dpaa_eth_add_device(int fman_id,
> @@ -800,6 +801,7 @@ static int mac_probe(struct platform_device *_of_dev)
>
> /* The 10G interface only supports one mode */
> if (mac_dev->phy_if == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_XFI ||
> + mac_dev->phy_if == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SFI ||
Again, no difference between these two.
I just don't see the point of perpetuating the XFI and SFI names for
something that is just plain 10GBASE-R.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
Powered by blists - more mailing lists