[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191219.141619.1840874136750249908.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 14:16:19 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: stephen@...workplumber.org
Cc: cforno12@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
mst@...hat.com, jasowang@...hat.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com,
sthemmin@...rosoft.com, sashal@...nel.org, tlfalcon@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH, net-next, v3, 0/2] net/ethtool: Introduce
link_ksettings API for virtual network devices
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 13:11:56 -0800
> I don't think this makes sense for netvsc. The speed and duplex have no
> meaning, why do you want to allow overriding it? If this is to try and make
> some dashboard look good; then you aren't seeing the real speed which is
> what only the host knows. Plus it does take into account the accelerated
> networking path.
Maybe that's the point, userspace has extraneous knowledge it might
use to set it accurately.
This helps for bonding/team etc. as well.
I don't think there is any real harm in allowing to set this, and
we've done this in the past I think.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists