[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191219082602.GT8621@gauss3.secunet.de>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 09:26:02 +0100
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan <subashab@...eaurora.org>,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/4] udp: Support UDP fraglist GRO/GSO.
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 11:03:09AM -0500, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 8:35 AM Steffen Klassert
> <steffen.klassert@...unet.com> wrote:
>
> > @@ -544,6 +585,18 @@ INDIRECT_CALLABLE_SCOPE int udp4_gro_complete(struct sk_buff *skb, int nhoff)
> > const struct iphdr *iph = ip_hdr(skb);
> > struct udphdr *uh = (struct udphdr *)(skb->data + nhoff);
> >
> > + if (NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->is_flist) {
> > + uh->len = htons(skb->len - nhoff);
> > +
> > + skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type |= (SKB_GSO_FRAGLIST|SKB_GSO_UDP_L4);
> > + skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_segs = NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->count;
> > +
> > + skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
> > + skb->csum_level = ~0;
>
> why is this needed for ipv4 only?
It is needed for IPv6 too, I've just forgot to add it there.
Thanks for the review!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists