[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c2c17e94-bf36-0816-260b-07fededd0e42@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 14:24:48 -0800
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>,
Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Wingman Kwok <w-kwok2@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 net-next 01/11] net: phy: Introduce helper functions
for time stamping support.
On 12/20/19 10:15 AM, Richard Cochran wrote:
> Some parts of the networking stack and at least one driver test fields
> within the 'struct phy_device' in order to query time stamping
> capabilities and to invoke time stamping methods. This patch adds a
> functional interface around the time stamping fields. This will allow
> insulating the callers from future changes to the details of the time
> stamping implemenation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Ideally we may even add locking annotations to make sure that there
there is no use after free in that the test is true, you de-reference
the PHY device and/or driver method, and boom. All callers appear to be
under RTNL right now.
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists