netdev - Re: [net-next v5 PATCH] page_pool: handle page recycle for NUMA_NO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191220104937.GA15487@apalos.home>
Date:   Fri, 20 Dec 2019 12:49:37 +0200
From:   Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
To:     Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, lirongqing@...du.com,
        linyunsheng@...wei.com, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
        mhocko@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next v5 PATCH] page_pool: handle page recycle for
 NUMA_NO_NODE condition

On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 11:41:16AM +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 12:23:14 +0200
> Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Jesper, 
> > 
> > I like the overall approach since this moves the check out of  the hotpath. 
> > @Saeed, since i got no hardware to test this on, would it be possible to check
> > that it still works fine for mlx5?
> > 
> > [...]
> > > +	struct ptr_ring *r = &pool->ring;
> > > +	struct page *page;
> > > +	int pref_nid; /* preferred NUMA node */
> > > +
> > > +	/* Quicker fallback, avoid locks when ring is empty */
> > > +	if (__ptr_ring_empty(r))
> > > +		return NULL;
> > > +
> > > +	/* Softirq guarantee CPU and thus NUMA node is stable. This,
> > > +	 * assumes CPU refilling driver RX-ring will also run RX-NAPI.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	pref_nid = (pool->p.nid == NUMA_NO_NODE) ? numa_mem_id() : pool->p.nid;  
> > 
> > One of the use cases for this is that during the allocation we are not
> > guaranteed to pick up the correct NUMA node. 
> > This will get automatically fixed once the driver starts recycling packets. 
> > 
> > I don't feel strongly about this, since i don't usually like hiding value
> > changes from the user but, would it make sense to move this into 
> > __page_pool_alloc_pages_slow() and change the pool->p.nid?
> > 
> > Since alloc_pages_node() will replace NUMA_NO_NODE with numa_mem_id()
> > regardless, why not store the actual node in our page pool information?
> > You can then skip this and check pool->p.nid == numa_mem_id(), regardless of
> > what's configured. 
> 
> This single code line helps support that drivers can control the nid
> themselves.  This is a feature that is only used my mlx5 AFAIK.
> 
> I do think that is useful to allow the driver to "control" the nid, as
> pinning/preferring the pages to come from the NUMA node that matches
> the PCI-e controller hardware is installed in does have benefits.

Sure you can keep the if statement as-is, it won't break anything. 
Would we want to store the actual numa id in pool->p.nid if the user selects 
'NUMA_NO_NODE'?


Thanks
/Ilias
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
>   Jesper Dangaard Brouer
>   MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
>   LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
>