netdev - Re: [PATCH V2 net 0/2] fixes of interrupt moderation bugs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 20 Dec 2019 21:42:26 -0800 (PST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     akiyano@...zon.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, dwmw@...zon.com, zorik@...zon.com,
        matua@...zon.com, saeedb@...zon.com, msw@...zon.com,
        aliguori@...zon.com, nafea@...zon.com, gtzalik@...zon.com,
        netanel@...zon.com, alisaidi@...zon.com, benh@...zon.com,
        ndagan@...zon.com, shayagr@...zon.com, sameehj@...zon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 net 0/2] fixes of interrupt moderation bugs

From: <akiyano@...zon.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 17:40:54 +0200

> From: Arthur Kiyanovski <akiyano@...zon.com>
> 
> 
> Differences from V1:
> 1. Updated default tx interrupt moderation to 64us
> 2. Added "Fixes:" tags.
> 3. Removed cosmetic changes that are not relevant for these bug fixes
> 
> This patchset includes a couple of fixes of bugs in the implemenation of
> interrupt moderation.

I'll apply this series, but... why do you put empty lines between the Fixes
and other tags?  Please don't do that.

When people do stuff like this I have to ask, where did you see someone else
do this?  Where did you pick up this convention?

Thank you.