lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 21 Dec 2019 13:52:22 +0800
From:   kevin kou <qdkevin.kou@...il.com>
To:     Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
CC:     vyasevich@...il.com, nhorman@...driver.com, davem@...emloft.net,
        linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sctp: do trace_sctp_probe after SACK validation and check

As this trace used to trace the changes of SCTP association state in response to incoming packets(SACK). It is used for debugging SCTP congestion control algorithms, so according to the code in include/trace/events/sctp.h, this trace event only prints the below information, and seems it is hard to point out if the SACK is duplicate one. 



TP_printk("asoc=%#llx%s ipaddr=%pISpc state=%u cwnd=%u ssthresh=%u " "flight_size=%u partial_bytes_acked=%u pathmtu=%u", __entry->asoc, __entry->primary ? "(*)" : "", __entry->ipaddr, __entry->state, __entry->cwnd, __entry->ssthresh, __entry->flight_size, __entry->partial_bytes_acked, __entry->pathmtu)


2019年12月21日 00:18, 00:18,在 Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com> 已写:
>On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 04:47:03AM +0000, Kevin Kou wrote:
>> The function sctp_sf_eat_sack_6_2 now performs
>> the Verification Tag validation, Chunk length validation, Bogu check,
>> and also the detection of out-of-order SACK based on the RFC2960
>> Section 6.2 at the beginning, and finally performs the further
>> processing of SACK. The trace_sctp_probe now triggered before
>> the above necessary validation and check.
>> 
>> This patch is to do the trace_sctp_probe after the necessary check
>> and validation to SACK.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Kou <qdkevin.kou@...il.com>
>> ---
>>  net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c | 3 ++-
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
>> index 42558fa..b4a54df 100644
>> --- a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
>> +++ b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
>> @@ -3281,7 +3281,6 @@ enum sctp_disposition
>sctp_sf_eat_sack_6_2(struct net *net,
>>  	struct sctp_sackhdr *sackh;
>>  	__u32 ctsn;
>>  
>> -	trace_sctp_probe(ep, asoc, chunk);
>>  
>>  	if (!sctp_vtag_verify(chunk, asoc))
>>  		return sctp_sf_pdiscard(net, ep, asoc, type, arg, commands);
>> @@ -3319,6 +3318,8 @@ enum sctp_disposition
>sctp_sf_eat_sack_6_2(struct net *net,
>>  	if (!TSN_lt(ctsn, asoc->next_tsn))
>>  		return sctp_sf_violation_ctsn(net, ep, asoc, type, arg, commands);
>>  
>> +	trace_sctp_probe(ep, asoc, chunk);
>> +
>
>Moving it here will be after the check against ctsn_ack_point, which
>could cause duplicated SACKs to be missed from the log.
>
>Yes, from the sender-side CC we don't care about it (yet), but it
>helps to spot probably avoidable retransmissions.
>
>I think this is cleaning up the noise too much. I can agree with
>moving it to after the chunk sanity tests, though.
>
>>  	/* Return this SACK for further processing.  */
>>  	sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_PROCESS_SACK,
>SCTP_CHUNK(chunk));
>>  
>> -- 
>> 1.8.3.1
>> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists