[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpWLryJ+gPyzQEwj1kF+z7sfY50mtwmNX=swn44LP0npQw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2019 12:43:32 -0800
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: shmulik@...anetworks.com
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>,
Shmulik Ladkani <sladkani@...ofpoint.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/sched: act_mirred: Ensure mac_len is pulled
prior redirect to a non mac_header_xmit target device
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 4:33 AM <shmulik@...anetworks.com> wrote:
>
> From: Shmulik Ladkani <sladkani@...ofpoint.com>
>
> There's no skb_pull performed when a mirred action is set at egress of a
> mac device, with a target device/action that expects skb->data to point
> at the network header.
>
> As a result, either the target device is errornously given an skb with
> data pointing to the mac (egress case), or the net stack receives the
> skb with data pointing to the mac (ingress case).
>
> E.g:
> # tc qdisc add dev eth9 root handle 1: prio
> # tc filter add dev eth9 parent 1: prio 9 protocol ip handle 9 basic \
> action mirred egress redirect dev tun0
>
> (tun0 is a tun device. result: tun0 errornously gets the eth header
> instead of the iph)
>
> Revise the push/pull logic of tcf_mirred_act() to not rely on the
> skb_at_tc_ingress() vs tcf_mirred_act_wants_ingress() comparison, as it
> does not cover all "pull" cases.
>
> Instead, calculate whether the required action on the target device
> requires the data to point at the network header, and compare this to
> whether skb->data points to network header - and make the push/pull
> adjustments as necessary.
This is a bug fix, please target it for -net and add a proper Fixes tag.
BTW, please make the subject shorter.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists