[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191224.222504.1002685539423182176.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2019 22:25:04 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: martinvarghesenokia@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, pshelar@....org, scott.drennan@...ia.com,
jbenc@...hat.com, martin.varghese@...ia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 0/3] New openvswitch MPLS actions for layer
2 tunnelling
From: Martin Varghese <martinvarghesenokia@...il.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2019 08:49:36 +0530
> The existing PUSH MPLS action inserts MPLS header between ethernet header
> and the IP header. Though this behaviour is fine for L3 VPN where an IP
> packet is encapsulated inside a MPLS tunnel, it does not suffice the L2
> VPN (l2 tunnelling) requirements. In L2 VPN the MPLS header should
> encapsulate the ethernet packet.
>
> The new mpls action ADD_MPLS inserts MPLS header at the start of the
> packet or at the start of the l3 header depending on the value of l3 tunnel
> flag in the ADD_MPLS arguments.
>
> POP_MPLS action is extended to support ethertype 0x6558
...
Series applied, thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists