[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADVnQyknyvPfjgRXrWpG2_4A4yVPiwbtA68Om9PuiRO9ymfJjw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2019 18:23:41 -0500
From: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>,
Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/5] tcp_cubic: optimize hystart_update()
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 3:28 PM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> We do not care which bit in ca->found is set.
>
> We avoid accessing hystart and hystart_detect unless really needed,
> possibly avoiding one cache line miss.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> ---
Thanks, good idea.
> @@ -450,7 +447,7 @@ static void bictcp_acked(struct sock *sk, const struct ack_sample *sample)
> ca->delay_min = delay;
>
> /* hystart triggers when cwnd is larger than some threshold */
> - if (hystart && tcp_in_slow_start(tp) &&
> + if (!ca->found && hystart && tcp_in_slow_start(tp) &&
> tp->snd_cwnd >= hystart_low_window)
> hystart_update(sk, delay);
> }
For the many connections that exit the initial slow start due to loss
or ECN marks, it seems ca->found would always be 0, so such
connections will be at risk for taking a cache miss to fetch
'hystart'. WDYT about further reordering the logic to avoid that risk
for such connections, e.g.:
- if (hystart && tcp_in_slow_start(tp) &&
+ if (!ca->found && tcp_in_slow_start(tp) && hystart &&
neal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists