netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] netfilter: add indr block setup in nf_flow_table

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20191225.195000.1150683636639114235.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Wed, 25 Dec 2019 19:50:00 -0800 (PST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     wenxu@...oud.cn
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] netfilter: add indr block setup in
 nf_flow_table_offload

From: wenxu <wenxu@...oud.cn>
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2019 09:46:51 +0800

> 在 2019/12/25 17:48, wenxu@...oud.cn 写道:
>> From: wenxu <wenxu@...oud.cn>
>>
>> This patch provide tunnel offload in nf_flow_table_offload based on
>> route lwtunnel. 
>> The first patch add TC_SETP_FT type in flow_indr_block_call.
>> The next two patches add support indr callback setup in flowtable offload.
>> The last two patches add tunnel match and action offload.
> 
> Hi  David,
> 
> This series modify the net/core/flow_offload.c and net/sched/cls_api.c files.
> 
> This series maybe be suit for net-next tree but not nf-next tree?

It's fine for nf-next, we'll just resolve any conflicts that show up.