[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191227180011.GF1435@localhost>
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2019 10:00:11 -0800
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, vivien.didelot@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] gianfar: Fix TX timestamping with stacked (DSA
and PHY) drivers
On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 02:44:34AM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> But a stacked driver such as a DSA switch or a PTP-capable PHY can
> also set SKBTX_IN_PROGRESS, which is actually exactly what it should do
> in order to denote that the hardware timestamping process is undergoing.
Please remove the text about the PHY. This driver does not call
skb_tx_timestamp(), and so it isn't possible for a PHY driver to set
the flag.
> There have been discussions [0] as to whether non-MAC drivers need or not to
> set SKBTX_IN_PROGRESS at all (whose purpose is to avoid sending 2
> timestamps, a sw and a hw one, to applications which only expect one).
> But as of this patch, there are at least 2 PTP drivers that would break
> in conjunction with gianfar: the sja1105 DSA switch and the TI PHYTER
> (dp83640).
Again, please drop the bit about the phyter. It is a non-issue here.
The clash with the DSA layer is reason enough for this patch.
> Fixes: f0ee7acfcdd4 ("gianfar: Add hardware TX timestamping support")
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Acked-by: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists