netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] net: dsa: sja1105: Use PTP core's dedicated kernel thread for RX timestamping

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 27 Dec 2019 14:43:41 +0200
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc:     kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] net: dsa: sja1105: Use PTP core's dedicated
 kernel thread for RX timestamping

On Fri, 27 Dec 2019 at 07:28, kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Vladimir,
>
> I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
>
> [auto build test ERROR on net-next/master]
> [also build test ERROR on net/master linus/master v5.5-rc3 next-20191220]
> [cannot apply to sparc-next/master]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
> improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
> base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]
>
> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Vladimir-Oltean/Improvements-to-SJA1105-DSA-RX-timestamping/20191227-104228
> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git 0914d2bb11cc182039084ac3b961dc359b647468
> config: sparc64-randconfig-a001-20191226 (attached as .config)
> compiler: sparc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 7.5.0
> reproduce:
>         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>         GCC_VERSION=7.5.0 make.cross ARCH=sparc64
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
>    drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_ptp.c: In function 'sja1105_change_rxtstamping':
>    drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_ptp.c:86:27: warning: unused variable 'ptp_data' [-Wunused-variable]
>      struct sja1105_ptp_data *ptp_data = &priv->ptp_data;
>                               ^~~~~~~~

Oops, this should have been part of 3/3 not 2/3...

>    drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_ptp.c: In function 'sja1105_ptp_clock_unregister':
> >> drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_ptp.c:654:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'ptp_cancel_worker_sync'; did you mean 'cancel_work_sync'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

And the attached .config.gz says that the error here is on the case
where CONFIG_PTP_1588_CLOCK=n. Ok.

>      ptp_cancel_worker_sync(ptp_data->clock);
>      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>      cancel_work_sync
>    cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>
> vim +654 drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_ptp.c
>
>    645
>    646  void sja1105_ptp_clock_unregister(struct dsa_switch *ds)
>    647  {
>    648          struct sja1105_private *priv = ds->priv;
>    649          struct sja1105_ptp_data *ptp_data = &priv->ptp_data;
>    650
>    651          if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ptp_data->clock))
>    652                  return;
>    653
>  > 654          ptp_cancel_worker_sync(ptp_data->clock);
>    655          skb_queue_purge(&ptp_data->skb_rxtstamp_queue);
>    656          ptp_clock_unregister(ptp_data->clock);
>    657          ptp_data->clock = NULL;
>    658  }
>    659
>
> ---
> 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                 Open Source Technology Center
> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org Intel Corporation

Will send out a v2.

Sorry,
-Vladimir