[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1577699681-14748-1-git-send-email-yangpc@wangsu.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 17:54:41 +0800
From: Pengcheng Yang <yangpc@...gsu.com>
To: edumazet@...gle.com
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, kafai@...com,
songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com, andriin@...com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Pengcheng Yang <yangpc@...gsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH] tcp: fix "old stuff" D-SACK causing SACK to be treated as D-SACK
When we receive a D-SACK, where the sequence number satisfies:
undo_marker <= start_seq < end_seq <= prior_snd_una
we consider this is a valid D-SACK and tcp_is_sackblock_valid()
returns true, then this D-SACK is discarded as "old stuff",
but the variable first_sack_index is not marked as negative
in tcp_sacktag_write_queue().
If this D-SACK also carries a SACK that needs to be processed
(for example, the previous SACK segment was lost), this SACK
will be treated as a D-SACK in the following processing of
tcp_sacktag_write_queue(), which will eventually lead to
incorrect updates of undo_retrans and reordering.
Fixes: fd6dad616d4f ("[TCP]: Earlier SACK block verification & simplify access to them")
Signed-off-by: Pengcheng Yang <yangpc@...gsu.com>
---
net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index 88b987c..0238b55 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -1727,8 +1727,11 @@ static int tcp_sack_cache_ok(const struct tcp_sock *tp, const struct tcp_sack_bl
}
/* Ignore very old stuff early */
- if (!after(sp[used_sacks].end_seq, prior_snd_una))
+ if (!after(sp[used_sacks].end_seq, prior_snd_una)) {
+ if (i == 0)
+ first_sack_index = -1;
continue;
+ }
used_sacks++;
}
--
1.8.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists