[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <74d9de44-95ff-2308-90df-ea5fe4f88ddf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 10:22:36 -0800
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@...nk.ru>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
Matteo Croce <mcroce@...hat.com>,
Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>,
Paul Blakey <paulb@...lanox.com>,
Yoshiki Komachi <komachi.yoshiki@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 03/19] net: dsa: tag_ar9331: add
.flow_dissect() callback
On 12/30/19 6:30 AM, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> ...to make RPS work correctly if user would like to configure it.
> Misc: fix identation of ar9331_netdev_ops structure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@...nk.ru>
> ---
> net/dsa/tag_ar9331.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/dsa/tag_ar9331.c b/net/dsa/tag_ar9331.c
> index 466ffa92a474..399ca21ec03b 100644
> --- a/net/dsa/tag_ar9331.c
> +++ b/net/dsa/tag_ar9331.c
> @@ -83,12 +83,20 @@ static struct sk_buff *ar9331_tag_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb,
> return skb;
> }
>
> +static void ar9331_tag_flow_dissect(const struct sk_buff *skb, __be16 *proto,
> + int *offset)
> +{
> + *offset = AR9331_HDR_LEN;
> + *proto = *(__be16 *)skb->data;
If we provided an offset from the beginning of the frame, then there is
no need to call .flow_dissect() at all and we can just return the
dsa_device_ops::overhead and offset_start (whatever is the name we pick)
and avoid a function call.
> +}
> +
> static const struct dsa_device_ops ar9331_netdev_ops = {
> - .name = "ar9331",
> - .proto = DSA_TAG_PROTO_AR9331,
> - .xmit = ar9331_tag_xmit,
> - .rcv = ar9331_tag_rcv,
> - .overhead = AR9331_HDR_LEN,
> + .name = "ar9331",
> + .proto = DSA_TAG_PROTO_AR9331,
> + .xmit = ar9331_tag_xmit,
> + .rcv = ar9331_tag_rcv,
> + .flow_dissect = ar9331_tag_flow_dissect,
> + .overhead = AR9331_HDR_LEN,
> };
>
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists