netdev - Re: [PATCH] tcp: fix "old stuff" D-SACK causing SACK to be treated as D-SACK

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200102.154305.639050830505824860.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Thu, 02 Jan 2020 15:43:05 -0800 (PST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     yangpc@...gsu.com
Cc:     edumazet@...gle.com, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
        ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, kafai@...com,
        songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com, andriin@...com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: fix "old stuff" D-SACK causing SACK to be treated
 as D-SACK

From: Pengcheng Yang <yangpc@...gsu.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 17:54:41 +0800

> When we receive a D-SACK, where the sequence number satisfies:
> 	undo_marker <= start_seq < end_seq <= prior_snd_una
> we consider this is a valid D-SACK and tcp_is_sackblock_valid()
> returns true, then this D-SACK is discarded as "old stuff",
> but the variable first_sack_index is not marked as negative
> in tcp_sacktag_write_queue().
> 
> If this D-SACK also carries a SACK that needs to be processed
> (for example, the previous SACK segment was lost), this SACK
> will be treated as a D-SACK in the following processing of
> tcp_sacktag_write_queue(), which will eventually lead to
> incorrect updates of undo_retrans and reordering.
> 
> Fixes: fd6dad616d4f ("[TCP]: Earlier SACK block verification & simplify access to them")
> Signed-off-by: Pengcheng Yang <yangpc@...gsu.com>

Applied and queued up for -stable, thank you.