lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F7F515CBB@ORSMSX115.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 2 Jan 2020 18:22:52 +0000
From:   "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To:     Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
        "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
CC:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "michael.chan@...adcom.com" <michael.chan@...adcom.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "luto@...nel.org" <luto@...nel.org>,
        "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "David.Laight@...LAB.COM" <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
        "Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] drivers/net/b44: Change to non-atomic bit operations

> Why not just make pwol_pattern aligned and choose the right word to do
> the operation on?

We use that approach for places where the operation needs to be atomic.

But this one doesn't need an atomic operation since there can be no other
entity operating on the same bitmap in parallel.

-Tony

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ