netdev - Re: [net-next v6 PATCH 0/2] page_pool: NUMA node handling fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 02 Jan 2020 15:38:25 -0800 (PST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     brouer@...hat.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, lirongqing@...du.com,
        linyunsheng@...wei.com, ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org,
        saeedm@...lanox.com, mhocko@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next v6 PATCH 0/2] page_pool: NUMA node handling fixes

From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2019 18:13:13 +0100

> The recently added NUMA changes (merged for v5.5) to page_pool, it both
> contains a bug in handling NUMA_NO_NODE condition, and added code to
> the fast-path.
> 
> This patchset fixes the bug and moves code out of fast-path. The first
> patch contains a fix that should be considered for 5.5. The second
> patch reduce code size and overhead in case CONFIG_NUMA is disabled.
> 
> Currently the NUMA_NO_NODE setting bug only affects driver 'ti_cpsw'
> (drivers/net/ethernet/ti/), but after this patchset, we plan to move
> other drivers (netsec and mvneta) to use NUMA_NO_NODE setting.

Series applied to net-next with the "fallthrough" misspelling fixed in
patch #1.

Thank you.