[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200103204241.GB18808@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2020 20:42:42 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] Fix 10G PHY interface types
Recent discussion has revealed that our current usage of the 10GKR
phy_interface_t is not correct. This is based on a misunderstanding
caused in part by the various specifications being difficult to
obtain. Now that a better understanding has been reached, we ought
to correct this.
This series introduce PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_10GBASER to replace the
existing usage of 10GKR mode, and document their differences in the
phylib documentation. Then switch PHY, SFP/phylink, the Marvell
PP2 network driver, and its associated comphy driver over to use
the correct interface mode. None of the existing platform usage
was actually using 10GBASE-KR.
In order to maintain compatibility with existing DT files, arrange
for the Marvell PP2 driver to rewrite the phy interface mode; this
allows other drivers to adopt correct behaviour w.r.t whether the
10G connection conforms to the backplane 10GBASE-KR protocol vs
normal 10GBASE-R protocol.
After applying these locally to net-next I've validated that the
only places which mention the old PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_10GKR
definition are:
Documentation/networking/phy.rst:``PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_10GKR``
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c: if (phy_mode == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_10GKR)
drivers/net/phy/aquantia_main.c: phydev->interface = PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_10GKR;
drivers/net/phy/aquantia_main.c: phydev->interface != PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_10GKR &&
include/linux/phy.h: PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_10GKR,
include/linux/phy.h: case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_10GKR:
which is as expected. The only users of "10gbase-kr" in DT are:
arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-7040-db.dts: phy-mode = "10gbase-kr";
arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-8040-clearfog-gt-8k.dts: phy-mode = "10gbase-kr";
arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-8040-db.dts: phy-mode = "10gbase-kr";
arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-8040-db.dts: phy-mode = "10gbase-kr";
arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-8040-mcbin-singleshot.dts: phy-mode = "10gbase-kr";
arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-8040-mcbin-singleshot.dts: phy-mode = "10gbase-kr";
arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-8040-mcbin.dts: phy-mode = "10gbase-kr";arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-8040-mcbin.dts: phy-mode = "10gbase-kr";arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/cn9130-db.dts: phy-mode = "10gbase-kr";
arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/cn9131-db.dts: phy-mode = "10gbase-kr";
arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/cn9132-db.dts: phy-mode = "10gbase-kr";
which all use the mvpp2 driver, and these will be updated in a
separate patch to be submitted in the following kernel cycle.
v2: add comment to mvpp2 driver.
Documentation/networking/phy.rst | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
drivers/net/phy/aquantia_main.c | 7 +++++--
drivers/net/phy/bcm84881.c | 4 ++--
drivers/net/phy/marvell10g.c | 11 ++++++-----
drivers/net/phy/phylink.c | 1 +
drivers/net/phy/sfp-bus.c | 2 +-
drivers/phy/marvell/phy-mvebu-cp110-comphy.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
include/linux/phy.h | 12 ++++++++----
9 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
Powered by blists - more mailing lists