netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: Remove indirect function call for flow dissection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 3 Jan 2020 02:19:58 +0200
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc:     netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@...nk.ru>,
        Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
        Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
        Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
        Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
        Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
        Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
        Petar Penkov <ppenkov@...gle.com>,
        Matteo Croce <mcroce@...hat.com>,
        Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paul Blakey <paulb@...lanox.com>,
        Yoshiki Komachi <komachi.yoshiki@...il.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: Remove indirect function call for flow dissection

Hi Florian,

On Fri, 3 Jan 2020 at 01:39, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> wrote:
>
> We only need "static" information to be given for DSA flow dissection,
> so replace the expensive call to .flow_dissect() with an integer giving
> us the offset into the packet array of bytes that we must de-reference

packet array? packed array?

> to obtain the protocol number. The overhead was alreayd available from

already

> the dsa_device_ops structure so use that directly.
>
> The presence of a flow_dissect callback used to indicate that the DSA
> tagger supported returning that information,we now encode this with a
> proto_off value of DSA_PROTO_OFF_UNPSEC if the tagger does not support

UNSPEC

> providing that information yet.
>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> ---

Unfortunately I don't really understand the DSA implementations of flow_dissect.
Is proto_off supposed to mean "the __be16 pointer difference A - B
between A. the position of the real EtherType and B. the current
skb->data (aka ETH_HLEN bytes into the frame, aka 2 bytes after the
normal EtherType was supposed to be)"?
Otherwise said, the offset in bytes between the real EtherType
position and skb->data is 2 * (proto_off + 1).
Furthermore, the offset in bytes is exactly equal to the tagger
overhead in bytes, unless it's a tag that doesn't push the EtherType
to the right, such as the trailer tag.

If the above is indeed correct, can you just skip DSA_PROTO_OFF_UNSPEC
and add proper proto_off values "in blind" for all taggers? I think
it's rather safe to assume that they all push the EtherType to the
right with the exception of the trailer tag, which will have an offset
of -1 in terms of __be16 pointers, by the way (so your -1 encoding of
DSA_PROTO_OFF_UNSPEC won't work for it anyway).

Also, documenting the unit of measurement for proto_off would really
go a long way.

What is a good test that the flow_dissector does what it's supposed to
do with DSA?

Regards,
-Vladimir