netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] WireGuard bug fixes and cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 05 Jan 2020 14:13:32 -0800 (PST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     Jason@...c4.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] WireGuard bug fixes and cleanups

From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Date: Thu,  2 Jan 2020 17:47:48 +0100

> I've been working through some personal notes and also the whole git
> repo history of the out-of-tree module, looking for places where
> tradeoffs were made (and subsequently forgotten about) for old kernels.
> The first two patches in this series clean up those. The first one does
> so in the self-tests and self-test harness, where we're now able to
> expand test coverage by a bit, and we're now cooking away tests on every
> commit to both the wireguard-linux repo and to net-next. The second one
> removes a workaround for a skbuff.h bug that was fixed long ago.
> Finally, the last patch in the series fixes in a bug unearthed by newer
> Qualcomm chipsets running the rmnet_perf driver, which does UDP GRO.

Series applied.

I wonder if, for patch #3, we should have a gro cells helper which just
does that list thing and thus makes the situation self documenting.