netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/8] Simplify xdp_do_redirect_map()/xdp_do_flush

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87o8vfic3l.fsf@toke.dk>
Date:   Tue, 07 Jan 2020 15:18:38 +0100
From:   Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
To:     Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Cc:     Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        "Karlsson\, Magnus" <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
        Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>, brouer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/8] Simplify xdp_do_redirect_map()/xdp_do_flush_map() and XDP maps

Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com> writes:

> On Tue, 07 Jan 2020 14:27:41 +0100
> Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>> Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com> writes:
>> 
>> > On Tue, 07 Jan 2020 12:25:47 +0100
>> > Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com> wrote:
>> >  
>> >> Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com> writes:
>> >>   
>> >> > On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 at 11:30, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com> wrote:    
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com> writes:
>> >> >>    
>> >> > [...]    
>> >> >> > I have now went over the entire patchset, and everything look perfect,
>> >> >> > I will go as far as saying it is brilliant.  We previously had the
>> >> >> > issue, that using different redirect maps in a BPF-prog would cause the
>> >> >> > bulking effect to be reduced, as map_to_flush cause previous map to get
>> >> >> > flushed. This is now solved :-)    
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Another thing that occurred to me while thinking about this: Now that we
>> >> >> have a single flush list, is there any reason we couldn't move the
>> >> >> devmap xdp_bulk_queue into struct net_device? That way it could also be
>> >> >> used for the non-map variant of bpf_redirect()?
>> >> >>    
>> >> >
>> >> > Indeed! (At least I don't see any blockers...)    
>> >> 
>> >> Cool, that's what I thought. Maybe I'll give that a shot, then, unless
>> >> you beat me to it ;)  
>> >  
>> > Generally sounds like a good idea.
>> >
>> > It this only for devmap xdp_bulk_queue?  
>> 
>> Non-map redirect only supports redirecting across interfaces (the
>> parameter is an ifindex), so yeah, this would be just for that.
>
> Sure, then you don't need to worry about below gotchas.
>
> I do like the idea, as this would/should solve the non-map redirect
> performance issue.

Yes, that was exactly my thought. Taking a stab at it now... :)

>> > Some gotchas off the top of my head.
>> >
>> > The cpumap also have a struct xdp_bulk_queue, which have a different
>> > layout. (sidenote: due to BTF we likely want rename that).
>> >
>> > If you want to generalize this across all redirect maps type. You
>> > should know, that it was on purpose that I designed the bulking to be
>> > map specific, because that allowed each map to control its own optimal
>> > bulking.  E.g. devmap does 16 frames bulking, cpumap does 8 frames (as
>> > it matches sending 1 cacheline into underlying ptr_ring), xskmap does
>> > 64 AFAIK (which could hurt-latency, but that is another discussion).  
>> 
>> Björn's patches do leave the per-type behaviour, they just get rid of
>> the per-map flush queues... :)
>
> Yes, I know ;-)

I know you do; was just a bit puzzled why you brought up all that other
stuff, and, well, had to answer something, didn't I? ;)

-Toke