[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200107155031.GB349285@krava>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 16:50:31 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>, Martin Lau <kafai@...com>,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
David Miller <davem@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] bpf: Allow non struct type for btf ctx access
On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 01:13:23PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 09:36:17PM +0000, Yonghong Song wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 12/29/19 6:37 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > I'm not sure why the restriction was added,
> > > but I can't access pointers to POD types like
> > > const char * when probing vfs_read function.
> > >
> > > Removing the check and allow non struct type
> > > access in context.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
> > > ---
> > > kernel/bpf/btf.c | 6 ------
> > > 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> > > index ed2075884724..ae90f60ac1b8 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> > > @@ -3712,12 +3712,6 @@ bool btf_ctx_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type,
> > > /* skip modifiers */
> > > while (btf_type_is_modifier(t))
> > > t = btf_type_by_id(btf, t->type);
> > > - if (!btf_type_is_struct(t)) {
> > > - bpf_log(log,
> > > - "func '%s' arg%d type %s is not a struct\n",
> > > - tname, arg, btf_kind_str[BTF_INFO_KIND(t->info)]);
> > > - return false;
> > > - }
> >
> > Hi, Jiri, the RFC looks great! Especially, you also referenced this will
> > give great performance boost for bcc scripts.
> >
> > Could you provide more context on why the above change is needed?
> > The function btf_ctx_access is used to check validity of accessing
> > function parameters which are wrapped inside a structure, I am wondering
> > what kinds of accesses you tried to address here.
>
> when I was transforming opensnoop.py to use this I got fail in
> there when I tried to access filename arg in do_sys_open
>
> but actualy it seems this should get recognized earlier by:
>
> if (btf_type_is_int(t))
> /* accessing a scalar */
> return true;
>
> I'm not sure why it did not pass for const char*, I'll check
it seems we don't check for pointer to scalar (just void),
which is the case in my example 'const char *filename'
I'll post this in v2 with other changes
jirka
---
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
index ed2075884724..650df4ed346e 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
@@ -3633,7 +3633,7 @@ bool btf_ctx_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type,
const struct bpf_prog *prog,
struct bpf_insn_access_aux *info)
{
- const struct btf_type *t = prog->aux->attach_func_proto;
+ const struct btf_type *tp, *t = prog->aux->attach_func_proto;
struct bpf_prog *tgt_prog = prog->aux->linked_prog;
struct btf *btf = bpf_prog_get_target_btf(prog);
const char *tname = prog->aux->attach_func_name;
@@ -3695,6 +3695,17 @@ bool btf_ctx_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type,
*/
return true;
+ tp = btf_type_by_id(btf, t->type);
+ /* skip modifiers */
+ while (btf_type_is_modifier(tp))
+ tp = btf_type_by_id(btf, tp->type);
+
+ if (btf_type_is_int(tp))
+ /* This is a pointer scalar.
+ * It is the same as scalar from the verifier safety pov.
+ */
+ return true;
+
/* this is a pointer to another type */
info->reg_type = PTR_TO_BTF_ID;
info->btf_id = t->type;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists