lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 06 Jan 2020 16:19:17 -0800
From:   Andre Guedes <andre.guedes@...ux.intel.com>
To:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>,
        Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>
Cc:     Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH iproute2-next] taprio: Add support for the SetAndHold and SetAndRelease commands

Hi Jose,

Quoting Jose Abreu (2019-12-18 15:08:45)
> From: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>
> Date: Dec/18/2019, 23:05:13 (UTC+00:00)
> 
> > However, I feel that this is incomplete. At least the way I understand
> > things, without specifying which traffic classes are going to be
> > preemptible (or it's dual concept, express), I don't see how this is
> > going to be used in practice. Or does the hardware have a default
> > configuration, that all traffic classes are preemptible, for example.
> > 
> > What am I missing here?
> 
> On our IPs Queue 0 is by preemptible and all remaining ones are express 
> by default.

Is this configuration fixed in your IP or the user can control if a specific
queue is preemptible or express?

I'm trying to figure out how this discussion relates to the Qbu discussion
we're having in "[v1,net-next, 1/2] ethtool: add setting frame preemption of
traffic classes".

Regards,

Andre

Powered by blists - more mailing lists