netdev - Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: sdio: Fix OOB interrupt initialization on brcm43362

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 8 Jan 2020 17:57:07 +0300
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To:     Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>
Cc:     Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com,
        brcm80211-dev-list@...ress.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        hdegoede@...hat.com, franky.lin@...adcom.com,
        hante.meuleman@...adcom.com, chi-hsien.lin@...ress.com,
        wright.feng@...ress.com, kvalo@...eaurora.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: sdio: Fix OOB interrupt initialization on
 brcm43362

08.01.2020 10:39, Jean-Philippe Brucker пишет:
> On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 07:23:32PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>> Hello Jean,
>>>>
>>>> Could you please clarify whether you applied [1] and then the above
>>>> snippet on top of it or you only applied [1] without the snippet?
>>>
>>> I applied [1] without the snippet
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jean
>>>
>>>>
>>>> [1] brcmfmac: Keep OOB wake-interrupt disabled when it shouldn't be enabled
>>
>> Will you be able to test *with* the snippet? I guess chances that it
>> will make any difference are not high, nevertheless will be good to know
>> for sure.
> 
> I tested it with the snippet and didn't notice a difference

Okay