[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ+HfNim-W57KYpsYE3hu4iXa_EtjtvURHqh6iSmVHdi0OcsLQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2020 11:25:41 +0100
From: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com>
To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
"Karlsson, Magnus" <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/8] xdp: make devmap flush_list common for
all map instances
On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 11:23, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com> writes:
>
> > On Tue, 7 Jan 2020 at 18:58, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com> wrote:
> >>
> > [...]
> >> __dev_flush()?
> >>
> > [...]
> >>
> >> Looks good changing the function name would make things a bit cleaner IMO.
> >>
> >
> > Hmm, I actually prefer the _map_ naming, since it's more clear that
> > "entries from the devmap" are being flushed -- but dev_flush() works
> > as well! :-) I can send a follow-up with the name change!
>
> Or I can just change it at the point where I'm adding support for
> non-map redirect (which is when the _map suffix stops being accurate)? :)
>
Even better! :-) Thanks!
Björn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists