netdev - [PATCH bpf-next v4 04/11] bpf: Support bitfield read access in btf_struct

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 8 Jan 2020 16:35:01 -0800
From:   Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
To:     <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <kernel-team@...com>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 04/11] bpf: Support bitfield read access in btf_struct_access

This patch allows bitfield access as a scalar.

It checks "off + size > t->size" to avoid accessing bitfield
end up accessing beyond the struct.  This check is done
outside of the loop since it is applicable to all access.

It also takes this chance to break early on the "off < moff" case.

Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
---
 kernel/bpf/btf.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
index 6a5ccb748a72..48bbde2e1c1e 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
@@ -3744,19 +3744,53 @@ int btf_struct_access(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	for_each_member(i, t, member) {
-		if (btf_member_bitfield_size(t, member))
-			/* bitfields are not supported yet */
-			continue;
+	if (off + size > t->size) {
+		bpf_log(log, "access beyond struct %s at off %u size %u\n",
+			tname, off, size);
+		return -EACCES;
+	}
 
+	for_each_member(i, t, member) {
 		/* offset of the field in bytes */
 		moff = btf_member_bit_offset(t, member) / 8;
 		if (off + size <= moff)
 			/* won't find anything, field is already too far */
 			break;
+
+		if (btf_member_bitfield_size(t, member)) {
+			u32 end_bit = btf_member_bit_offset(t, member) +
+				btf_member_bitfield_size(t, member);
+
+			/* off <= moff instead of off == moff because clang
+			 * does not generate a BTF member for anonymous
+			 * bitfield like the ":16" here:
+			 * struct {
+			 *	int :16;
+			 *	int x:8;
+			 * };
+			 */
+			if (off <= moff &&
+			    BITS_ROUNDUP_BYTES(end_bit) <= off + size)
+				return SCALAR_VALUE;
+
+			/* off may be accessing a following member
+			 *
+			 * or
+			 *
+			 * Doing partial access at either end of this
+			 * bitfield.  Continue on this case also to
+			 * treat it as not accessing this bitfield
+			 * and eventually error out as field not
+			 * found to keep it simple.
+			 * It could be relaxed if there was a legit
+			 * partial access case later.
+			 */
+			continue;
+		}
+
 		/* In case of "off" is pointing to holes of a struct */
 		if (off < moff)
-			continue;
+			break;
 
 		/* type of the field */
 		mtype = btf_type_by_id(btf_vmlinux, member->type);
-- 
2.17.1