lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f1b34465-0bdc-e108-c887-5d04ec64e861@intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 9 Jan 2020 12:11:36 -0800
From:   Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
To:     Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, valex@...lanox.com, jiri@...nulli.us
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] doc: fix typo of snapshot in documentation

On 1/9/2020 12:06 PM, Jacob Keller wrote:
> On 1/9/2020 12:00 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>> On Thu,  9 Jan 2020 11:08:21 -0800
>> Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com> wrote:
>>
>>> A couple of locations accidentally misspelled snapshot as shapshot.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
>>> ---
>>>  Documentation/admin-guide/devices.txt    | 2 +-
>>>  Documentation/media/v4l-drivers/meye.rst | 2 +-
>>>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/devices.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/devices.txt
>>> index 1c5d2281efc9..2a97aaec8b12 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/devices.txt
>>> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/devices.txt
>>> @@ -319,7 +319,7 @@
>>>  		182 = /dev/perfctr	Performance-monitoring counters
>>>  		183 = /dev/hwrng	Generic random number generator
>>>  		184 = /dev/cpu/microcode CPU microcode update interface
>>> -		186 = /dev/atomicps	Atomic shapshot of process state data
>>> +		186 = /dev/atomicps	Atomic snapshot of process state data
>>>  		187 = /dev/irnet	IrNET device
>>
>> Oops, irnet is part of irda which is no longer part of the kernel.
>>
> 
> This is probably based on the wrong tree. Will rebase and re-send.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jake>

Well, I did rebase the patches locally but the contents are still the
same so I'm not going to resend. I guess it's just because the
devices.txt file hasn't been updated?

-Jake

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ