[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a5f5fc5bf913c9a22923d1a556f511e6@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2020 09:46:14 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Jianyong Wu <Jianyong.Wu@....com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, yangbo.lu@....com, john.stultz@...aro.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, pbonzini@...hat.com,
sean.j.christopherson@...el.com, richardcochran@...il.com,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>, will@...nel.org,
Suzuki Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@....com>,
Steven Price <Steven.Price@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Steve Capper <Steve.Capper@....com>,
Kaly Xin <Kaly.Xin@....com>, Justin He <Justin.He@....com>,
nd <nd@....com>, kvm-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v9 7/8] ptp: arm64: Enable ptp_kvm for arm64
On 2020-01-09 09:24, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 2020-01-09 05:59, Jianyong Wu wrote:
[...]
>> So we focus it on arm64. Also I have never tested it on arm32 machine
>> ( we lack of arm32 machine)
>
> I'm sure your employer can provide you with such a box. I can probably
> even tell you which cupboard they are stored in... ;-)
>
>> Do you think it's necessary to enable ptp_kvm on arm32? If so, I can
>> do that.
>
> I can't see why we wouldn't, given that it should be a zero effort task
> (none of the code here is arch specific).
To be clear, what I'm after is support for 32bit *guests*. I don't
expect any
issue with a 32bit host (it's all common code), but you should be able
to test
32bit guests pretty easily (most ARMv8.0 CPUs support 32bit EL1).
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists