[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87zhevsrwk.fsf@codeaurora.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 09:16:11 +0200
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
ath10k@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ath10k: Enable QDSS clock on sm8150
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org> writes:
> On SM8150 the WiFi firmware depends on the QDSS clock ticking, or the system
> will reset due to an NoC error. So this adds an optional clock to the ath10k
> binding and makes sure it's enabled while the WiFi firmware needs it.
>
> Bjorn Andersson (2):
> ath10k: Add optional qdss clk
> arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: Specify qdss clock for wifi
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qcom,ath10k.txt | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi | 4 ++--
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Via which tree are these supposed to go? I'll take patch 1 and arm
mantainers take patch 2, or what?
--
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
Powered by blists - more mailing lists