netdev - [PATCH net] net/route: remove ip route rtm_src_len, rtm_dst

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200110082456.7288-1-liuhangbin@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 10 Jan 2020 16:24:56 +0800
From:   Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH net] net/route: remove ip route rtm_src_len, rtm_dst_len valid check

In patch set e266afa9c7af ("Merge branch
'net-use-strict-checks-in-doit-handlers'") we added a check for
rtm_src_len, rtm_dst_len, which will cause cmds like
"ip route get 192.0.2.0/24" failed.

There is no sense to restrict rtm_src_len, rtm_dst_len to 32 for IPv4,
or 128 for IPv6. Remove this check.

Reported-by: Jianlin Shi <jishi@...hat.com>
Fixes: d0440029831b ("net: ipv4: ipmr: perform strict checks also for doit handlers")
Fixes: a00302b60777 ("net: ipv4: route: perform strict checks also for doit handlers")
Fixes: 0eff0a274104 ("net: ipv6: route: perform strict checks also for doit handlers")
Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
---
 net/ipv4/ipmr.c  | 10 +---------
 net/ipv4/route.c | 10 +---------
 net/ipv6/route.c | 10 +---------
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/ipmr.c b/net/ipv4/ipmr.c
index 6e68def66822..293a0189ff4e 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ipmr.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ipmr.c
@@ -2500,9 +2500,7 @@ static int ipmr_rtm_valid_getroute_req(struct sk_buff *skb,
 					      rtm_ipv4_policy, extack);
 
 	rtm = nlmsg_data(nlh);
-	if ((rtm->rtm_src_len && rtm->rtm_src_len != 32) ||
-	    (rtm->rtm_dst_len && rtm->rtm_dst_len != 32) ||
-	    rtm->rtm_tos || rtm->rtm_table || rtm->rtm_protocol ||
+	if (rtm->rtm_tos || rtm->rtm_table || rtm->rtm_protocol ||
 	    rtm->rtm_scope || rtm->rtm_type || rtm->rtm_flags) {
 		NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "ipv4: Invalid values in header for multicast route get request");
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -2513,12 +2511,6 @@ static int ipmr_rtm_valid_getroute_req(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	if ((tb[RTA_SRC] && !rtm->rtm_src_len) ||
-	    (tb[RTA_DST] && !rtm->rtm_dst_len)) {
-		NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "ipv4: rtm_src_len and rtm_dst_len must be 32 for IPv4");
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
-
 	for (i = 0; i <= RTA_MAX; i++) {
 		if (!tb[i])
 			continue;
diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c
index 87e979f2b74a..fb36780ee415 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
@@ -3063,9 +3063,7 @@ static int inet_rtm_valid_getroute_req(struct sk_buff *skb,
 					      rtm_ipv4_policy, extack);
 
 	rtm = nlmsg_data(nlh);
-	if ((rtm->rtm_src_len && rtm->rtm_src_len != 32) ||
-	    (rtm->rtm_dst_len && rtm->rtm_dst_len != 32) ||
-	    rtm->rtm_table || rtm->rtm_protocol ||
+	if (rtm->rtm_table || rtm->rtm_protocol ||
 	    rtm->rtm_scope || rtm->rtm_type) {
 		NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "ipv4: Invalid values in header for route get request");
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -3083,12 +3081,6 @@ static int inet_rtm_valid_getroute_req(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	if ((tb[RTA_SRC] && !rtm->rtm_src_len) ||
-	    (tb[RTA_DST] && !rtm->rtm_dst_len)) {
-		NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "ipv4: rtm_src_len and rtm_dst_len must be 32 for IPv4");
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
-
 	for (i = 0; i <= RTA_MAX; i++) {
 		if (!tb[i])
 			continue;
diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
index affb51c11a25..4e82d4fd1b53 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
@@ -5714,9 +5714,7 @@ static int inet6_rtm_valid_getroute_req(struct sk_buff *skb,
 					      rtm_ipv6_policy, extack);
 
 	rtm = nlmsg_data(nlh);
-	if ((rtm->rtm_src_len && rtm->rtm_src_len != 128) ||
-	    (rtm->rtm_dst_len && rtm->rtm_dst_len != 128) ||
-	    rtm->rtm_table || rtm->rtm_protocol || rtm->rtm_scope ||
+	if (rtm->rtm_table || rtm->rtm_protocol || rtm->rtm_scope ||
 	    rtm->rtm_type) {
 		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Invalid values in header for get route request");
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -5732,12 +5730,6 @@ static int inet6_rtm_valid_getroute_req(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	if ((tb[RTA_SRC] && !rtm->rtm_src_len) ||
-	    (tb[RTA_DST] && !rtm->rtm_dst_len)) {
-		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "rtm_src_len and rtm_dst_len must be 128 for IPv6");
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
-
 	for (i = 0; i <= RTA_MAX; i++) {
 		if (!tb[i])
 			continue;
-- 
2.19.2