lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200110105027.257877-6-jakub@cloudflare.com>
Date:   Fri, 10 Jan 2020 11:50:21 +0100
From:   Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
To:     bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...udflare.com,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 05/11] bpf, sockmap: Allow inserting listening TCP sockets into sockmap

In order for sockmap type to become a generic collection for storing TCP
sockets we need to loosen the checks during map update, while tightening
the checks in redirect helpers.

Currently sockmap requires the TCP socket to be in established state (or
transitioning out of SYN_RECV into established state when done from BPF),
which prevents inserting listening sockets.

Change the update pre-checks so that the socket can also be in listening
state. If the state is not white-listed, return -EINVAL to be consistent
with REUSEPORT_SOCKARRY map type.

Since it doesn't make sense to redirect with sockmap to listening sockets,
add appropriate socket state checks to BPF redirect helpers too.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
---
 net/core/sock_map.c                     | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c |  6 +---
 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/sock_map.c b/net/core/sock_map.c
index eb114ee419b6..99daea502508 100644
--- a/net/core/sock_map.c
+++ b/net/core/sock_map.c
@@ -396,6 +396,23 @@ static bool sock_map_sk_is_suitable(const struct sock *sk)
 	       sk->sk_protocol == IPPROTO_TCP;
 }
 
+/* Is sock in a state that allows inserting into the map?
+ * SYN_RECV is needed for updates on BPF_SOCK_OPS_PASSIVE_ESTABLISHED_CB.
+ */
+static bool sock_map_update_okay(const struct sock *sk)
+{
+	return (1 << sk->sk_state) & (TCPF_ESTABLISHED |
+				      TCPF_SYN_RECV |
+				      TCPF_LISTEN);
+}
+
+/* Is sock in a state that allows redirecting into it? */
+static bool sock_map_redirect_okay(const struct sock *sk)
+{
+	return (1 << sk->sk_state) & (TCPF_ESTABLISHED |
+				      TCPF_SYN_RECV);
+}
+
 static int sock_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
 				void *value, u64 flags)
 {
@@ -413,11 +430,14 @@ static int sock_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
 		ret = -EINVAL;
 		goto out;
 	}
-	if (!sock_map_sk_is_suitable(sk) ||
-	    sk->sk_state != TCP_ESTABLISHED) {
+	if (!sock_map_sk_is_suitable(sk)) {
 		ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
 		goto out;
 	}
+	if (!sock_map_update_okay(sk)) {
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out;
+	}
 
 	sock_map_sk_acquire(sk);
 	ret = sock_map_update_common(map, idx, sk, flags);
@@ -433,6 +453,7 @@ BPF_CALL_4(bpf_sock_map_update, struct bpf_sock_ops_kern *, sops,
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held());
 
 	if (likely(sock_map_sk_is_suitable(sops->sk) &&
+		   sock_map_update_okay(sops->sk) &&
 		   sock_map_op_okay(sops)))
 		return sock_map_update_common(map, *(u32 *)key, sops->sk,
 					      flags);
@@ -454,13 +475,17 @@ BPF_CALL_4(bpf_sk_redirect_map, struct sk_buff *, skb,
 	   struct bpf_map *, map, u32, key, u64, flags)
 {
 	struct tcp_skb_cb *tcb = TCP_SKB_CB(skb);
+	struct sock *sk;
 
 	if (unlikely(flags & ~(BPF_F_INGRESS)))
 		return SK_DROP;
-	tcb->bpf.flags = flags;
-	tcb->bpf.sk_redir = __sock_map_lookup_elem(map, key);
-	if (!tcb->bpf.sk_redir)
+
+	sk = __sock_map_lookup_elem(map, key);
+	if (!sk || !sock_map_redirect_okay(sk))
 		return SK_DROP;
+
+	tcb->bpf.flags = flags;
+	tcb->bpf.sk_redir = sk;
 	return SK_PASS;
 }
 
@@ -477,12 +502,17 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sk_redirect_map_proto = {
 BPF_CALL_4(bpf_msg_redirect_map, struct sk_msg *, msg,
 	   struct bpf_map *, map, u32, key, u64, flags)
 {
+	struct sock *sk;
+
 	if (unlikely(flags & ~(BPF_F_INGRESS)))
 		return SK_DROP;
-	msg->flags = flags;
-	msg->sk_redir = __sock_map_lookup_elem(map, key);
-	if (!msg->sk_redir)
+
+	sk = __sock_map_lookup_elem(map, key);
+	if (!sk || !sock_map_redirect_okay(sk))
 		return SK_DROP;
+
+	msg->flags = flags;
+	msg->sk_redir = sk;
 	return SK_PASS;
 }
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
index 02eae1e864c2..c6766b2cff85 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
@@ -756,11 +756,7 @@ static void test_sockmap(unsigned int tasks, void *data)
 	/* Test update without programs */
 	for (i = 0; i < 6; i++) {
 		err = bpf_map_update_elem(fd, &i, &sfd[i], BPF_ANY);
-		if (i < 2 && !err) {
-			printf("Allowed update sockmap '%i:%i' not in ESTABLISHED\n",
-			       i, sfd[i]);
-			goto out_sockmap;
-		} else if (i >= 2 && err) {
+		if (err) {
 			printf("Failed noprog update sockmap '%i:%i'\n",
 			       i, sfd[i]);
 			goto out_sockmap;
-- 
2.24.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ