[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMArcTUVwu+ofDy9D5TEfAcHkdvsZ6uxsKzH-19qLxBJo7d2QA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 22:57:22 +0900
From: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@...pl>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/5] netdevsim: fix stack-out-of-bounds in nsim_dev_debugfs_init()
On Sun, 12 Jan 2020 at 22:47, Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@...pl> wrote:
>
Hi Jakub,
Thank you for your review!
> On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 16:37:09 +0000, Taehee Yoo wrote:
> > When netdevsim dev is being created, a debugfs directory is created.
> > The variable "dev_ddir_name" is 16bytes device name pointer and device
> > name is "netdevsim<dev id>".
> > The maximum dev id length is 10.
> > So, 16bytes for device name isn't enough.
> >
> > Test commands:
> > modprobe netdevsim
> > echo "1000000000 0" > /sys/bus/netdevsim/new_device
> >
> > Splat looks like:
> > [ 90.624922][ T1000] BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in number+0x824/0x880
> > [ 90.626999][ T1000] Write of size 1 at addr ffff8880b7f47988 by task bash/1000
> > [ 90.627798][ T1000]
> > [ 90.628076][ T1000] CPU: 0 PID: 1000 Comm: bash Not tainted 5.5.0-rc5+ #270
> > [ 90.628806][ T1000] Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS VirtualBox 12/01/2006
> > [ 90.629752][ T1000] Call Trace:
> > [ 90.630080][ T1000] dump_stack+0x96/0xdb
> > [ 90.630512][ T1000] ? number+0x824/0x880
> > [ 90.630939][ T1000] print_address_description.constprop.5+0x1be/0x360
> > [ 90.631610][ T1000] ? number+0x824/0x880
> > [ 90.632038][ T1000] ? number+0x824/0x880
> > [ 90.632469][ T1000] __kasan_report+0x12a/0x16f
> > [ 90.632939][ T1000] ? number+0x824/0x880
> > [ 90.633397][ T1000] kasan_report+0xe/0x20
> > [ 90.633954][ T1000] number+0x824/0x880
> > [ 90.634513][ T1000] ? put_dec+0xa0/0xa0
> > [ 90.635047][ T1000] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x90/0xc0
> > [ 90.636469][ T1000] vsnprintf+0x63c/0x10b0
> > [ 90.637187][ T1000] ? pointer+0x5b0/0x5b0
> > [ 90.637871][ T1000] ? mark_lock+0x11d/0xc40
> > [ 90.638591][ T1000] sprintf+0x9b/0xd0
> > [ 90.639164][ T1000] ? scnprintf+0xe0/0xe0
> > [ 90.639802][ T1000] nsim_dev_probe+0x63c/0xbf0 [netdevsim]
> > [ ... ]
> >
> > Fixes: 83c9e13aa39a ("netdevsim: add software driver for testing offloads")
>
> The correct Fixes tag is:
>
> Fixes: ab1d0cc004d7 ("netdevsim: change debugfs tree topology")
>
Thank you! I will fix the Fixes tag.
> > Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c b/drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c
> > index 634eb5cdcbbe..a0c80a70bb23 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c
> > @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ static const struct file_operations nsim_dev_take_snapshot_fops = {
> >
> > static int nsim_dev_debugfs_init(struct nsim_dev *nsim_dev)
> > {
> > - char dev_ddir_name[16];
> > + char dev_ddir_name[32];
>
> nit: it'd be tempting to size this to the correct value
> (20? or sizeof(DRV_NAME) + 10) rather than the arbitrary 32,
> perhaps?
>
I agree with this. This is more correct.
I will fix this too.
Thank you
Taehee Yoo.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists