[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN8PR12MB3266DFED453215D29BCF2727D3350@BN8PR12MB3266.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 15:17:53 +0000
From: Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
"linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com"
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v2 2/8] net: stmmac: tc: Add support for ETF
Scheduler using TBS
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Date: Jan/13/2020, 15:12:51 (UTC+00:00)
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 14:02:37 +0100, Jose Abreu wrote:
> > +static int tc_setup_etf(struct stmmac_priv *priv,
> > + struct tc_etf_qopt_offload *qopt)
> > +{
> > +
>
> There's a couple places I spotted where continuation lines are not
> aligned to the opening parenthesis, and here we have a spurious blank
> line. Please run this through checkpatch --strict, I see quite a few
> legit errors there.
Yeah, there are two errors that were left from debug ... Sorry :(
---
Thanks,
Jose Miguel Abreu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists