[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87a76qrpm6.fsf@cloudflare.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 17:04:33 +0100
From: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
To: Martin Lau <kafai@...com>
Cc: "bpf\@vger.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev\@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel-team\@cloudflare.com" <kernel-team@...udflare.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 03/11] net, sk_msg: Clear sk_user_data pointer on clone if tagged
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 09:15 PM CET, Martin Lau wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 11:50:19AM +0100, Jakub Sitnicki wrote:
>> sk_user_data can hold a pointer to an object that is not intended to be
>> shared between the parent socket and the child that gets a pointer copy on
>> clone. This is the case when sk_user_data points at reference-counted
>> object, like struct sk_psock.
>>
>> One way to resolve it is to tag the pointer with a no-copy flag by
>> repurposing its lowest bit. Based on the bit-flag value we clear the child
>> sk_user_data pointer after cloning the parent socket.
> LGTM. One nit, WARN_ON_ONCE should be enough for all the cases if they
> would ever happen. Having continuous splat on the same thing is not
> necessary useful while it could be quite distributing for people
> capture/log them.
Will switch to WARN_ON_ONCE in v3. Thanks for the review!
>
> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists