lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 15 Jan 2020 11:02:26 -0800
From:   Ben Greear <>
To:     David Ahern <>,
        "" <>
Subject: Re: vrf and multicast is broken in some cases

On 01/15/2020 10:45 AM, David Ahern wrote:
> On 1/15/20 10:57 AM, Ben Greear wrote:
>> Hello,
>> We put two different ports into their own VRF, and then tried to run a
>> multicast
>> sender on one and receiver on the other.  The receiver does not receive
>> anything.
>> Is this a known problem?
>> If we do a similar setup with policy based routing rules instead of VRF,
>> then the multicast
>> test works.
> It works for OSPF for example. I have lost track of FRR features that
> use it, so you will need to specify more details.
> Are the sender / receiver on the same host?

Yes, like eth2 sending to eth3, eth2 is associated with _vrf2, eth3 with _vrf3.

I'll go poking at the code.


Ben Greear <>
Candela Technologies Inc

Powered by blists - more mailing lists