lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <dbefe9b1-c846-6cc6-3819-520fd084a447@candelatech.com> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 11:02:26 -0800 From: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com> To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: vrf and multicast is broken in some cases On 01/15/2020 10:45 AM, David Ahern wrote: > On 1/15/20 10:57 AM, Ben Greear wrote: >> Hello, >> >> We put two different ports into their own VRF, and then tried to run a >> multicast >> sender on one and receiver on the other. The receiver does not receive >> anything. >> >> Is this a known problem? >> >> If we do a similar setup with policy based routing rules instead of VRF, >> then the multicast >> test works. >> > > It works for OSPF for example. I have lost track of FRR features that > use it, so you will need to specify more details. > > Are the sender / receiver on the same host? Yes, like eth2 sending to eth3, eth2 is associated with _vrf2, eth3 with _vrf3. I'll go poking at the code. Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists