| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <09401ab5-1888-a19b-9e27-bd9c0cf408fe@mellanox.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 08:51:14 +0000
From: Roi Dayan <roid@...lanox.com>
To: wenxu <wenxu@...oud.cn>, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
Mark Bloch <markb@...lanox.com>,
Paul Blakey <paulb@...lanox.com>,
Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net/mlx5e: Add mlx5e_flower_parse_meta
support
On 2020-01-15 1:58 AM, wenxu wrote:
>
> 2020/1/15 4:46, Saeed Mahameed :
>> Hi Wenxu,
>>
>> According to our regression Team, This commit is breaking vxlan offload
>> CC'ed Paul, Roi and Vlad, they will assist you if you need any help.
>>
>> can you please investigate the following call trace ?
>
> Hi Saeed & Paul,
>
>
> This patch just check the meta key match with the filter_dev. If this match failed,
>
> The new flower install will failed and never allocate new mlx5_fs_ftes.
>
> How can I reproduce this case? Can you provide the test case script?
>
>
> BR
>
> wenxu
Hi Saeed, Wenxu,
I reviewed the patch and verified manually just in case. Such issue should
not be reproduced from this patch and indeed I did not reproduce it.
I'll take the issue with our regression team.
I acked the patch. looks good to me.
Thanks,
Roi
>
>>
>>
>> [ 363.789805] #####################################
>> [ 363.791150] ## TEST test-vxlan-port-offload.sh ##
>> [ 363.792499] #####################################
>> [ 364.916862] :test: Test adding vxlan rule after creating vxlan
>> interface and reloading modules
>> [ 364.926877] :test: - create vxlan interface
>> [ 364.938976] :test: - reload modules
>> [ 365.689825] mlx5_core 0000:00:08.3 enp0s8f3: Link down
>> [ 365.790063] mlx5_core 0000:00:08.2 enp0s8f2: Link down
>> [ 366.040167] mlx5_core 0000:00:08.6 enp0s8f6: Link down
>> [ 370.399771] mlx5_core 0000:00:08.1: E-Switch: Disable:
>> mode(OFFLOADS), nvfs(1), active vports(2)
>> [ 371.006097] mlx5_core 0000:00:08.1: E-Switch: cleanup
>> [ 371.581179] mlx5_core 0000:00:08.1: driver left SR-IOV enabled
>> after remove
>> [ 371.585021] mlx5_core 0000:00:08.0: E-Switch: Disable:
>> mode(OFFLOADS), nvfs(3), active vports(4)
>> [ 371.743029]
>> =======================================================================
>> ======
>> [ 371.746917] BUG mlx5_fs_ftes (Not tainted): Objects remaining in
>> mlx5_fs_ftes on __kmem_cache_shutdown()
>> [ 371.751265] -----------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------
>> [ 371.751265]
>> [ 371.754662] Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint
>> [ 371.755672] INFO: Slab 0x00000000c3fc424e objects=27 used=1
>> fp=0x00000000b711cbdf flags=0x8000000000010200
>> [ 371.757523] CPU: 0 PID: 13112 Comm: modprobe Tainted:
>> G B 5.5.0-rc4-J8553-G8b261307a8b0 #1
>> [ 371.759458] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009),
>> BIOS rel-1.12.1-0-ga5cab58e9a3f-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
>> [ 371.761692] Call Trace:
>> [ 371.762378] dump_stack+0x50/0x70
>> [ 371.763168] slab_err+0xb7/0xdc
>> [ 371.763936] ? slub_cpu_dead+0x10/0xa0
>> [ 371.764873] ? on_each_cpu_cond_mask+0x7a/0xa0
>> [ 371.765919] ? __kmalloc+0x19f/0x1f0
>> [ 371.766749] __kmem_cache_shutdown.cold+0x1b/0x12f
>> [ 371.767769] kmem_cache_destroy+0x45/0xe0
>> [ 371.768669] mlx5_cleanup_fs+0x12c/0x150 [mlx5_core]
>> [ 371.769753] mlx5_unload+0x1e/0x70 [mlx5_core]
>> [ 371.770744] mlx5_unload_one+0x49/0xb0 [mlx5_core]
>> [ 371.771772] remove_one+0x38/0x80 [mlx5_core]
>> [ 371.772724] pci_device_remove+0x36/0xa0
>> [ 371.773625] device_release_driver_internal+0xe1/0x1b0
>> [ 371.774731] driver_detach+0x3f/0x79
>> [ 371.775532] bus_remove_driver+0x58/0xcc
>> [ 371.776407] pci_unregister_driver+0x2d/0x90
>> [ 371.777436] cleanup+0x11/0x254 [mlx5_core]
>> [ 371.778376] __x64_sys_delete_module+0x11b/0x1f0
>> [ 371.779358] ? exit_to_usermode_loop+0xac/0xb0
>> [ 371.780314] do_syscall_64+0x42/0x130
>> [ 371.781129] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
>> [ 371.782305] RIP: 0033:0x7f0496589ae7
>> [ 371.783107] Code: 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 99 a3 2b 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
>> 83 c8 ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 b8 b0 00 00 00
>> 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 69 a3 2b 00 f7 d8 64 89 01
>> 48
>> [ 371.786595] RSP: 002b:00007ffd14aff778 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX:
>> 00000000000000b0
>> [ 371.788122] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055e5a261bf70 RCX:
>> 00007f0496589ae7
>> [ 371.799948] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000800 RDI:
>> 000055e5a261bfd8
>> [ 371.801336] RBP: 000055e5a261bf70 R08: 00007ffd14afe721 R09:
>> 0000000000000000
>> [ 371.802773] R10: 00007f04965f81e0 R11: 0000000000000206 R12:
>> 000055e5a261bfd8
>> [ 371.804182] R13: 000055e5a261c8e0 R14: 000055e5a261bc38 R15:
>> 00007ffd14b00b98
>> [ 371.805633] INFO: Object 0x0000000057a96e69 @offset=9000
>> [ 371.806851] kmem_cache_destroy mlx5_fs_ftes: Slab cache still has
>> objects
>> [ 371.808330] CPU: 0 PID: 13112 Comm: modprobe Tainted:
>> G B 5.5.0-rc4-J8553-G8b261307a8b0 #1
>> [ 371.810311] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009),
>> BIOS rel-1.12.1-0-ga5cab58e9a3f-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
>>
>>
>>> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
>>> index 9b32a9c..33d1ce5 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
>>> @@ -1805,6 +1805,40 @@ static void *get_match_headers_value(u32
>>> flags,
>>> outer_headers);
>>> }
>>> +static int mlx5e_flower_parse_meta(struct net_device *filter_dev,
>>> + struct flow_cls_offload *f)
>>> +{
>>> + struct flow_rule *rule = flow_cls_offload_flow_rule(f);
>>> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack = f->common.extack;
>>> + struct net_device *ingress_dev;
>>> + struct flow_match_meta match;
>>> +
>>> + if (!flow_rule_match_key(rule, FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_META))
>>> + return 0;
>>> +
>>> + flow_rule_match_meta(rule, &match);
>>> + if (match.mask->ingress_ifindex != 0xFFFFFFFF) {
>>> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Unsupported ingress ifindex
>>> mask");
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + ingress_dev = __dev_get_by_index(dev_net(filter_dev),
>>> + match.key->ingress_ifindex);
>>> + if (!ingress_dev) {
>>> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
>>> + "Can't find the ingress port to
>>> match on");
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if (ingress_dev != filter_dev) {
>>> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
>>> + "Can't match on the ingress filter
>>> port");
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static int __parse_cls_flower(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
>>> struct mlx5_flow_spec *spec,
>>> struct flow_cls_offload *f,
>>> @@ -1825,6 +1859,7 @@ static int __parse_cls_flower(struct mlx5e_priv
>>> *priv,
>>> u16 addr_type = 0;
>>> u8 ip_proto = 0;
>>> u8 *match_level;
>>> + int err;
>>> match_level = outer_match_level;
>>> @@ -1868,6 +1903,10 @@ static int __parse_cls_flower(struct
>>> mlx5e_priv *priv,
>>> spec);
>>> }
>>> + err = mlx5e_flower_parse_meta(filter_dev, f);
>>> + if (err)
>>> + return err;
>>> +
>>> if (flow_rule_match_key(rule, FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_BASIC)) {
>>> struct flow_match_basic match;
>>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists