[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200116160435.GT795@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 17:04:35 +0100
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] netlink: make getters tolerate NULL nla arg
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com> wrote:
> Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de> writes:
>
> > One recurring bug pattern triggered by syzbot is NULL dereference in
> > netlink code paths due to a missing "tb[NL_ARG_FOO] != NULL" test.
> >
> > At least some of these missing checks would not have crashed the kernel if
> > the various nla_get_XXX helpers would return 0 in case of missing arg.
>
> Won't this risk just papering over the issue and lead to subtly wrong
> behaviour instead? At least a crash is somewhat visible :)
How? Its no different than tb[X] being set with a 0 value.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists