netdev - Re: [PATCH mlx5-next 00/10] Use ODP MRs for kernel ULPs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 16 Jan 2020 11:34:18 -0800
From:   santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>
Cc:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        Hans Westgaard Ry <hans.westgaard.ry@...cle.com>,
        Moni Shoua <monis@...lanox.com>,
        linux-netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mlx5-next 00/10] Use ODP MRs for kernel ULPs

On 1/16/20 5:57 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 06:59:29AM +0000, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>>>   45 files changed, 559 insertions(+), 256 deletions(-)
>>
>> Thanks Santosh for your review.
>>
>> David,
>> Is it ok to route those patches through RDMA tree given the fact that
>> we are touching a lot of files in drivers/infiniband/* ?
>>
>> There is no conflict between netdev and RDMA versions of RDS, but to be
>> on safe side, I'll put all this code to mlx5-next tree.
> 
> Er, lets not contaminate the mlx5-next with this..
> 
> It looks like it applies clean to -rc6 so if it has to be in both
> trees a clean PR against -rc5/6 is the way to do it.
> 
> Santos, do you anticipate more RDS patches this cycle?
> 

Not for upcoming merge window afaik.