| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 16:41:01 -0800
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
To: <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <ast@...com>,
<daniel@...earbox.net>
CC: <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>, <kernel-team@...com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>, Julia Kartseva <hex@...com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: add whitelist/blacklist of test names to test_progs
Add ability to specify a list of test name substrings for selecting which
tests to run. So now -t is accepting a comma-separated list of strings,
similarly to how -n accepts a comma-separated list of test numbers.
Additionally, add ability to blacklist tests by name. Blacklist takes
precedence over whitelist. Blacklisting is important for cases where it's
known that some tests can't pass (e.g., due to perf hardware events that are
not available within VM). This is going to be used for libbpf testing in
Travis CI in its Github repo.
Example runs with just whitelist and whitelist + blacklist:
$ sudo ./test_progs -tattach,core/existence
Summary: 8/8 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
$ sudo ./test_progs -tattach,core/existence -bcgroup,flow/arr
Summary: 4/6 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Cc: Julia Kartseva <hex@...com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c | 83 +++++++++++++++++++++---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h | 8 ++-
2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
index 7fa7d08a8104..bab1e6f1d8f1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
#include <string.h>
/* defined in test_progs.h */
-struct test_env env;
+struct test_env env = {};
struct prog_test_def {
const char *test_name;
@@ -29,10 +29,19 @@ struct prog_test_def {
static bool should_run(struct test_selector *sel, int num, const char *name)
{
- if (sel->name && sel->name[0] && !strstr(name, sel->name))
- return false;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < sel->blacklist.cnt; i++) {
+ if (strstr(name, sel->blacklist.strs[i]))
+ return false;
+ }
- if (!sel->num_set)
+ for (i = 0; i < sel->whitelist.cnt; i++) {
+ if (strstr(name, sel->whitelist.strs[i]))
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ if (!sel->whitelist.cnt && !sel->num_set)
return true;
return num < sel->num_set_len && sel->num_set[num];
@@ -334,6 +343,7 @@ const char argp_program_doc[] = "BPF selftests test runner";
enum ARG_KEYS {
ARG_TEST_NUM = 'n',
ARG_TEST_NAME = 't',
+ ARG_TEST_NAME_BLACKLIST = 'b',
ARG_VERIFIER_STATS = 's',
ARG_VERBOSE = 'v',
};
@@ -341,8 +351,10 @@ enum ARG_KEYS {
static const struct argp_option opts[] = {
{ "num", ARG_TEST_NUM, "NUM", 0,
"Run test number NUM only " },
- { "name", ARG_TEST_NAME, "NAME", 0,
- "Run tests with names containing NAME" },
+ { "name", ARG_TEST_NAME, "NAMES", 0,
+ "Run tests with names containing any string from NAMES list" },
+ { "name-blacklist", ARG_TEST_NAME_BLACKLIST, "NAMES", 0,
+ "Don't run tests with names containing any string from NAMES list" },
{ "verifier-stats", ARG_VERIFIER_STATS, NULL, 0,
"Output verifier statistics", },
{ "verbose", ARG_VERBOSE, "LEVEL", OPTION_ARG_OPTIONAL,
@@ -359,6 +371,41 @@ static int libbpf_print_fn(enum libbpf_print_level level,
return 0;
}
+static int parse_str_list(const char *s, struct str_set *set)
+{
+ char *input, *state = NULL, *next, **tmp, **strs = NULL;
+ int cnt = 0;
+
+ input = strdup(s);
+ if (!input)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ set->cnt = 0;
+ set->strs = NULL;
+
+ while ((next = strtok_r(state ? NULL : input, ",", &state))) {
+ tmp = realloc(strs, sizeof(*strs) * (cnt + 1));
+ if (!tmp)
+ goto err;
+ strs = tmp;
+
+ strs[cnt] = strdup(next);
+ if (!strs[cnt])
+ goto err;
+
+ cnt++;
+ }
+
+ set->cnt = cnt;
+ set->strs = (const char **)strs;
+ free(input);
+ return 0;
+err:
+ free(strs);
+ free(input);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+}
+
int parse_num_list(const char *s, struct test_selector *sel)
{
int i, set_len = 0, num, start = 0, end = -1;
@@ -449,12 +496,24 @@ static error_t parse_arg(int key, char *arg, struct argp_state *state)
if (subtest_str) {
*subtest_str = '\0';
- env->subtest_selector.name = strdup(subtest_str + 1);
- if (!env->subtest_selector.name)
+ if (parse_str_list(subtest_str + 1,
+ &env->subtest_selector.whitelist))
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+ if (parse_str_list(arg, &env->test_selector.whitelist))
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ break;
+ }
+ case ARG_TEST_NAME_BLACKLIST: {
+ char *subtest_str = strchr(arg, '/');
+
+ if (subtest_str) {
+ *subtest_str = '\0';
+ if (parse_str_list(subtest_str + 1,
+ &env->subtest_selector.blacklist))
return -ENOMEM;
}
- env->test_selector.name = strdup(arg);
- if (!env->test_selector.name)
+ if (parse_str_list(arg, &env->test_selector.blacklist))
return -ENOMEM;
break;
}
@@ -617,7 +676,11 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
printf("Summary: %d/%d PASSED, %d SKIPPED, %d FAILED\n",
env.succ_cnt, env.sub_succ_cnt, env.skip_cnt, env.fail_cnt);
+ free(env.test_selector.blacklist.strs);
+ free(env.test_selector.whitelist.strs);
free(env.test_selector.num_set);
+ free(env.subtest_selector.blacklist.strs);
+ free(env.subtest_selector.whitelist.strs);
free(env.subtest_selector.num_set);
return env.fail_cnt ? EXIT_FAILURE : EXIT_SUCCESS;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h
index de1fdaa4e7b4..99933a1857ca 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h
@@ -46,8 +46,14 @@ enum verbosity {
VERBOSE_SUPER,
};
+struct str_set {
+ const char **strs;
+ int cnt;
+};
+
struct test_selector {
- const char *name;
+ struct str_set whitelist;
+ struct str_set blacklist;
bool *num_set;
int num_set_len;
};
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists