[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200117183800.GA2649345@rani.riverdale.lan>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 13:38:01 -0500
From: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jinyuqi@...wei.com,
kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
guoyang2@...wei.com, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: optimize cmpxchg in ip_idents_reserve
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 10:16:45AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Wasńt it the case back in 2016 already for linux-4.8 ?
>
> What will prevent someone to send another report to netdev/lkml ?
>
> -fno-strict-overflow support is not a prereq for CONFIG_UBSAN.
>
> Fact that we kept in lib/ubsan.c and lib/test_ubsan.c code for
> test_ubsan_add_overflow() and test_ubsan_sub_overflow() is disturbing.
>
No, it was bumped in 2018 in commit cafa0010cd51 ("Raise the minimum
required gcc version to 4.6"). That raised it from 3.2 -> 4.6.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists