[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1e3cec29b871a86cc508e05b59405b2feaf79545.camel@strongswan.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 13:00:54 +0100
From: Martin Willi <martin@...ongswan.org>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH netfilter/iptables] Add new slavedev match extension
> > So I guess there is some value in these patches for those users to
> > extend their filtering with VRF support.
>
> A single xt_slavedev module only for this is too much overhead, if
> you find an existing extension (via revision infrastructure) where
> you can make this fit in, I would consider this.
The only feasible candidate I see is the physdev match. However, there
is not much in common code-wise. And from a user perspective, slavedev
matching via physdev and the interaction between these functionalities
just makes that confusing.
So for now I'll keep the slavedev match out-of-tree, then.
Thanks,
Martin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists